Modular Shredding and Screening Architecture for Wastewater Solids

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current municipal wastewater collection systems face challenges with inflexible and bulky twin-shafted shredders and rotating screen drum technologies, which are not adaptable to changes in application capacity requirements, leading to inefficiencies and high repair costs due to fixed configurations and inability to tune clearance between the drum and cutter stack.

Innovation Solution

A modular system with separate shredding device and rotating screening drum components, allowing for independent positioning and adjustment, including interchangeable housings and adjustable sealing elements, to enhance modularity, adaptability, and serviceability, facilitating changes in capacity and performance without replacing the entire unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If fixed configuration machines are used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but adaptability to changes in application capacity requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to capacity changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is divided into separate, interchangeable modules: the screen drum assembly and the cutter stack assembly. Each module can be independently manufactured, removed, and replaced. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to changing capacity requirements by swapping modules rather than redesigning the entire machine, thus maintaining manufacturing simplicity while dramatically improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static, fixed configuration to a dynamic, adjustable configuration. The screen drum diameter can be changed by replacing the drum assembly, and the cutter stack can be replaced independently. This dynamic capability allows the machine to be tuned to specific application requirements without complete redesign, resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the cutter stack and drum are housed in common end housings, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of repair deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing integrationVSAvoidcomponent accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The end housings are redesigned to accommodate separate, independently removable modules. The screen drum assembly can be removed from one end housing while the cutter stack remains in place, and vice versa. This segmentation allows repair personnel to access and replace individual components without disassembling the entire machine or dealing with integrated housings, significantly improving ease of repair while maintaining acceptable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If the clearance between drum and cutter stack is fixed, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to inability to tune for high flow applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearance fixationVSAvoidhydraulic capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The clearance between the drum and cutter stack is made adjustable through the modular design. By replacing the screen drum with one of a different diameter, the clearance is automatically adjusted. This dynamic adjustment capability allows the system to be optimized for high flow applications by selecting appropriate drum sizes, thereby increasing hydraulic capacity without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The physical parameter of clearance is changed by swapping modules with different dimensions. Different screen drum diameters provide different clearances, allowing the system to be tuned for specific productivity requirements. This parameter change approach enables high flow applications to achieve higher hydraulic capacity while maintaining a relatively simple modular structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If high capture is expected with high flow applications, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases due to fixed configuration limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolids capture efficiencyVSAvoidconfiguration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The segmentation into interchangeable modules allows the system to achieve high solids capture efficiency in high flow applications by selecting the appropriate screen drum diameter and cutter stack configuration. Each module can be optimized for specific performance characteristics, and the modular architecture prevents the system from becoming overly complex by using standardized, replaceable components rather than custom-integrated designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11691157B2Adaptive architecture solids diverter and comminutor
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 SULZER MANAGEMENT AG
  • US11691157B2 patent drawing
  • US11691157B2 patent drawing
  • US11691157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for comminuting solid waste material including a shredding device disposed within the casing and comprising parallel first and second shredding stacks that include first and second parallel shafts rotatably mounted between an upper shredding device housing and a lower shredding device housing and a rotating screening drum disposed within the casing and mounted between an upper screening drum housing and a lower screening drum housing, the rotating screening drum configured to permit fluid to pass therethrough while capturing solids on an outer surface for delivery to shredding device, an upstream portion of the rotating screening drum disposed upstream of an upstream portion of the shredding device. The upper shredding device housing and the lower screening device housing are separate members from the upper screening drum housing and the lower screening drum housing to permit interchangeability of different sizes of these components to meet system needs.