Modular Silencer Structure for Low-Turbulence Compressed Air Exhaust

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing silencers for compressed air systems in electric commercial vehicles fail to reduce noise levels below 68 dB(A) within 7 m, particularly due to the mixing of high-velocity air flow with ambient air, exceeding regulatory requirements.

Innovation Solution

A silencer design with two sound-damping means of varying diameters and densities, featuring a grid with optimized passages that reduce turbulence and increase surface area, combined with a modular housing system for customizable noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a conventional silencer design is used, then the structure is simple, but the noise level remains above 68 dB(A) and cannot meet regulatory requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelVSAvoidsilencer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The silencer is divided into multiple modular sections (first sound-damping means, second sound-damping means, grid section) that can be independently designed and optimized. Each segment performs a specific function: the first section handles initial noise reduction, the second section provides additional damping with higher density material, and the grid section manages airflow distribution. This segmentation allows the system to achieve below 60 dB(A) noise levels while maintaining manageable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the silencer use sound-damping materials with different densities optimized for their specific locations. The first sound-damping means uses a certain density material for initial noise reduction, while the second sound-damping means uses higher density material for enhanced damping in the critical outlet region. This local optimization of material properties enables effective noise reduction without uniformly increasing complexity throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the surface area of outflow is increased to reduce turbulence, then the noise level decreases, but the axial space required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelVSAvoidaxial space
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The silencer employs a grid structure with multiple passages that distributes airflow in three dimensions rather than a single large outlet. The grid section creates numerous small flow paths that collectively provide a large effective surface area for turbulence reduction, while the axial length of each individual passage remains compact. This dimensional approach allows achieving low noise levels (below 60 dB(A)) without requiring excessive axial space, as the noise reduction is accomplished through distributed three-dimensional flow management rather than a single large-dimensional outlet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The sound-damping materials are arranged in nested concentric layers around the compressed air flow path. The first sound-damping means forms an inner layer, while the second sound-damping means forms an outer layer with higher density material. This nested configuration maximizes the surface area available for noise dampening within a compact axial footprint, as each layer contributes to noise reduction without requiring additional axial length proportional to its surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the second sound-damping means has higher density, then the noise dampening effectiveness increases, but the flow resistance may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise dampening effectivenessVSAvoidflow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The higher density sound-damping material is strategically placed only in the second sound-damping means, specifically in regions where noise dampening effectiveness is most critical (downstream near the grid outlet). The first sound-damping means uses lower density material sufficient for initial noise reduction. This localized placement of high-density material maximizes noise dampening effectiveness in the critical outlet region while minimizing the total volume of high-density material, thereby reducing overall flow resistance and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The silencer employs a composite structure combining sound-damping materials with different densities in specific configurations. The first sound-damping means and second sound-damping means use materials with different density properties, creating a composite damping system. This composite approach allows optimizing noise reduction performance by placing higher density material where it provides maximum benefit (in the second sound-damping means near the outlet) while using lower density material in regions where less damping is required, thus balancing noise effectiveness with flow resistance considerations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively reduces noise levels to below 60 dB(A) by minimizing turbulence and ensuring homogeneous airflow, meeting regulatory standards while conserving axial space.

Implementation Method 1

a first sound-damping means (4), being arranged downstream of the inlet opening (3)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic absorption: Acoustic Absorption

Implementation Method 2

the second sound damping means (6) has at least a portion with higher density compared to the first sound damping means (4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous damping: Viscous Damping

Implementation Method 3

the grid (8) drives the flow to be as homogenous as possible, and further increases the surface area of the outflow in order to reduce the turbulence intensity of the outflow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence reduction: Turbulence

Implementation Method 4

the second sound damping means (6) has at least a portion with higher density compared to the first sound damping means (4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 5

By changing the diameter and the density of the first sound-damping means (4) and the second sound-damping means (6), there is a change in the noise level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic transmission: Refraction

Data Source

PatentEP4339046B1Modular low noise silencers for commercial vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.07.16 KNORR BREMSE SYSTEME FUER NUTZFAHIZEUGE GMBH
  • EP4339046B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP4339046B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP4339046B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b

AI summary

The present application deals with a silencer (1) for compressed air systems, comprising: an inlet opening (3) for a compressed gas flow, a first sound damping means (4) being arranged downstream of the inlet opening (3); a second sound damping means (6) being arranged downstream of the first sound damping means (4); a grid (8) being arranged downstream of the second sound damping means (6), comprising at least two passages (9) through which the compressed air flow is adapted to leave the silencer (1), wherein the first sound damping means (4) has a smaller diameter compared to the second sound damping means (6), and wherein the second sound damping means (6) has at least a portion with higher density compared to the first sound damping means (4). Such improved silencer (1) is able to perform a noise dampening adapted to specific requirements (e.g. technical guidelines, standards), and hence to reach lower noise values compared to systems of prior art.