Modular sorting assembly for print and digital media

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for sorting large quantities of used books, media, and other physical items are inefficient and labor-intensive, requiring significant space and manpower, which becomes impractical for large volumes or limited spaces.

Innovation Solution

A modular, scalable sorting assembly comprising a first level sorting unit with a doubled-sided workstation and a second level sorting unit with a central station flanked by angled wing units, allowing for efficient two-level sorting and easy adaptation to different spaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual sorting is performed on tables for small quantities of items, then sorting accuracy is maintained, but productivity drops significantly when scaling to large volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting throughputVSAvoidsorting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sorting process is divided into multiple levels (first level sorting unit and second level sorting unit), where items are sorted in stages rather than all at once. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different item groups, significantly increasing throughput while maintaining sorting accuracy at each level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from two-dimensional table sorting to a three-dimensional modular assembly with vertical stacking capabilities. The sorting units can be stacked and arranged in multiple levels, utilizing vertical space to increase sorting capacity without proportionally increasing floor space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If more space is provided for manual sorting of large volumes, then sorting capacity increases, but the solution becomes impractical for limited spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capacityVSAvoidsorting space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The sorting assembly utilizes vertical stacking to create multiple sorting levels within a compact footprint. By arranging sorting units vertically and using through-slots for item passage, the system achieves high sorting capacity in a limited horizontal space, effectively transitioning from 2D to 3D space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The modular sorting units are designed to be nested or stacked within each other, with smaller sorting components fitting within larger structural frameworks. This nesting approach maximizes space utilization by allowing multiple sorting functions to occupy overlapping spatial volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Productivity

If more people are hired to sort large quantities of items, then sorting speed increases, but labor costs may exceed sale profits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting speedVSAvoidmanpower required
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The sorting system segments the workforce into specialized roles at different levels (first level sorters, second level sorters, reviewers), allowing efficient division of labor. This segmentation enables a smaller total number of workers to achieve higher throughput compared to unstructured manual sorting, as each worker focuses on specific sorting criteria at their level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-level sorting assembly enables continuous processing where items move systematically from first level sorting through second level sorting without interruption. This continuous flow maximizes worker productivity and minimizes idle time, increasing sorting speed without proportionally increasing manpower requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of operation

If sorting is performed at the sale site, then item organization is achieved, but logistical problems arise when space or manpower is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting accessibilityVSAvoidlocation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The sorting assembly is designed with mobility features allowing it to be dynamically repositioned between sorting locations and sale sites. The modular units can be assembled and disassembled as needed, providing adaptability to different locations while maintaining sorting functionality, thus resolving the conflict between ease of operation and location flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12232610B1Modular sorting assembly for print and digital media
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 WILKINSON BEN
  • US12232610B1 patent drawing
  • US12232610B1 patent drawing
  • US12232610B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular, scalable sorting assembly for sorting items into boxes, comprising two sorting level units, each unit having accessible work spaces on both front and back sides, and with a work surface dividing each unit into upper and lower storage areas with through-slots formed into a lower storage area of each unit sized and shaped to store and receive one or more uniformly sized and shaped open top boxes. The upper storage area has a series of shelves sized and shaped to store items prior to sorting or after being sorted but prior to placement in the boxes. One of the two units is further comprised of a central workstation and a wing with a side wall configuration that angles the wing towards an area directly in front of the central workstation when the wing is positioned immediately adjacent thereto.