Decentralized Modular Space Body Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing space modules are limited in their ability to be arbitrarily assembled and require a central control module, leading to complex and costly systems with increased computer capacity needs as the space body grows, and lack decentralized resource management, making them inflexible and prone to resource failures.

Innovation Solution

A space body composed of interchangeable modules with decentralized resource management, each equipped with its own processor-controlled controller, supply interfaces for gas, liquid, and electric resources, and a standardized multiple connection for various supply lines, allowing for modular expansion and redundancy through networked control and resource distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a central control module is used to coordinate space modules, then control tasks can be managed, but the system complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol coordinationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into decentralized control units distributed across individual space modules rather than a single central control module. Each module has its own control unit that can autonomously manage local control tasks, eliminating the need for complex central coordination while maintaining overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each space module is equipped with its own control unit that enables self-service operation. The control units autonomously manage their respective modules without requiring external coordination, reducing the complexity of central control while ensuring each module can function independently or in coordination with others through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the space body is expanded by coupling more space modules, then functionality increases, but the computer capacity requirement of the central controller increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace body expandabilityVSAvoidcomputer capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Control capacity is segmented and distributed across multiple independent control units in each space module rather than concentrated in a single central controller. This allows the system to scale functionality by adding modules without proportionally increasing the computer capacity of any single unit, as each module manages its own control tasks locally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If redundant systems are used to compensate for controller failures, then reliability improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller failure safetyVSAvoidredundant systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent control units distributed across different space modules. This segmentation provides inherent redundancy - if one control unit fails, other modules with their own control units can continue to operate independently or take over functions, providing failure safety without requiring complex redundant systems within each controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each control unit is designed to be self-sufficient and autonomous, capable of independent operation without relying on redundant backup systems. The decentralized architecture ensures that failure of one control unit does not compromise the entire system, as other control units continue to manage their respective modules independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If resources are managed centrally, then coordination is simplified, but the system lacks flexibility and is prone to single points of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource coordinationVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Resource management is segmented and distributed across multiple control units in different space modules rather than centralized in one location. Each control unit manages resources locally within its module, providing flexibility and adaptability while maintaining coordination through standardized interfaces and communication protocols between modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11008121B2Space body
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 IBOSS GMBH
  • US11008121B2 patent drawing
  • US11008121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A space body has at least two space modules which can be interchangeably connected to one another. At least one closable connection opening is in each case provided on the space modules, via which a passage is produced when the space modules are connected. Furthermore, at least one coupling device connects in each case the space modules to one another. A supply interface is provided for coupling a supply line of the space modules.