Modular Capture Devices for Defunct Space Targets With Rebound Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for capturing defunct space crafts in orbit face challenges such as low efficiency, high cost, large mass, and reliability issues with space robotic arms, and risks of rebound and damage with harpoons, while rendezvous and docking is technically difficult and costly.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising capturing devices, a delivery device, a launching device, and a deceleration and recovery device, which delivers and launches capturing devices to a target orbit, allowing them to capture defunct space targets efficiently and decelerate to prevent rebound, using biodegradable materials for low cost and high adaptability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If space robotic arm is used to capture defunct space crafts, then capturing capability is improved, but mass increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapturing capabilityVSAvoidmass of space robotic arm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The capturing system is divided into separate functional modules: a lightweight launching device that propels capturing devices, and independent capturing devices that perform the actual capture. This segmentation eliminates the need for a heavy space robotic arm while maintaining capturing capability through modular, lightweight components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs disposable capturing devices that are launched, used for capture, and then discarded or deorbited. These lightweight single-use capturing devices replace the expensive, heavy, and reusable space robotic arm, significantly reducing both mass and cost while maintaining effective capture capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If space robotic arm is used to capture defunct space crafts, then capturing capability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapturing capabilityVSAvoidcost of space robotic arm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into inexpensive, simple components: a basic launching mechanism and separate capturing devices. This modular approach with simple functional units dramatically reduces manufacturing cost compared to the complex, integrated space robotic arm system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses low-cost disposable capturing devices instead of expensive reusable robotic arms. The simplicity of these single-use capturing devices makes them much cheaper to manufacture while still achieving the required capture capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If space webs are used to capture defunct space crafts, then capturing efficiency is improved, but the number of space webs is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapturing efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of space webs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The capturing devices are designed to be dynamically launched and deployed as needed. Multiple capturing devices can be sequentially launched to intercept different targets, providing dynamic adaptability that overcomes the static limitation of carrying a fixed number of space webs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic launching of capturing devices in sequences or batches. This periodic deployment allows the system to handle multiple targets over time, effectively increasing capturing efficiency without requiring all capturing devices to be carried simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Device complexity

If harpoons are used to capture defunct space crafts, then simplicity is improved, but rebound may damage onboard spacecraft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of space harpoonVSAvoidrebound damage to spacecraft
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary deceleration and recovery device that acts as a buffer between the capturing device and the spacecraft. This intermediary system absorbs the rebound energy and controls the return of the capturing device, preventing damage to the spacecraft while maintaining the simplicity of the harpoon-based capture mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12384562B2System and method for capturing space target
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 HARBIN INST OF TECH
  • US12384562B2 patent drawing
  • US12384562B2 patent drawing
  • US12384562B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a system and a method for capturing a space target. The system includes a plurality of capturing devices, a delivery device, a launching device, and a deceleration and recovery device, each of the plurality of capturing devices is configured to be launched into a target orbit to capture a defunct space target, the delivery device is configured to deliver, along a preset delivery trajectory, each of the plurality of capturing devices to a first preset location in the launching device, the launching device is configured to launch each of the plurality of capturing devices located at the first preset location into the target orbit to capture the defunct space target, and the deceleration and recovery device is configured to decelerate each of the plurality of capturing devices after it is launched and flies a preset distance.