Modular Star Support for Vertical Furnace Heat Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing holding devices for metal parts during heat treatment are bulky, difficult to repair, and not adaptable to different geometries, leading to high manufacturing costs and reduced production rates.

Innovation Solution

A holding device with a lifting column and star-shaped supports, where the arms are independently manufactured and welded to a hub, featuring clevis and yoke mechanisms for secure attachment and easy assembly, allowing for quick replacement and adaptation to various part geometries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If star supports are manufactured as one-piece casting, then mechanical strength is high, but manufacturing time is long and cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing rate
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The star support is divided into separate components: a hub and multiple arms that can be manufactured independently. The arms are then attached to the hub using clevis and yoke mechanisms, allowing parallel processing and reducing total manufacturing time while maintaining structural integrity through the modular assembly design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If star supports are manufactured as one-piece casting, then mechanical strength is high, but repairability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidrepairability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The modular design with separate arms and hub allows individual arms to be replaced without affecting the hub or other arms. When an arm wears out or breaks, it can be easily removed and replaced while maintaining the overall structural strength through the clevis-yoke connection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If star supports are manufactured as one-piece casting, then mechanical strength is high, but adaptability to different geometries is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidadaptability to different geometries
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The separable arm design allows customization of arm lengths, angles, and configurations to match different part geometries. The hub remains standardized while the arms can be adjusted or reconfigured to accommodate various heat treatment requirements and part shapes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If arms are welded to hub, then assembly is simple, but material is lost during separation for repair

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidmaterial loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The clevis and yoke mechanism serves as an intermediary connection system between the arm and hub, replacing direct welding. This allows for easy assembly and disassembly without material loss, as the connection can be separated cleanly without removing material from either component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

5Quantity of substance

If molds are made large to accommodate large star supports, then manufacturing is possible, but handling becomes difficult and production rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize of star supportVSAvoidproduction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The modular design allows the hub and arms to be manufactured separately in smaller, more manageable molds. This reduces the size and weight of individual molds, making them easier to handle and faster to produce, while the final assembly creates the complete star support structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies manufacturing, reduces costs, enhances mechanical strength, and facilitates quick repair and adaptation to different part geometries, improving overall efficiency and flexibility in heat treatment processes.

Implementation Method 1

first means of blocking intended to cooperate with second blocking means integral with the yoke to eliminate all play between the yoke and the arm, that is to say to block the arm in translation along the insertion axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastening: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

The hub comprises for each arm, a clevis formed by two lugs extending towards the outside of the hub

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Data Source

PatentEP3578910B1Device for holding a part for heat treatment for vertical furnaces
Publication Date: 2021.10.20 CRONITE CZ SRO
  • EP3578910B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3578910B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3578910B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a device (1) for holding in position a part for heat treatment in a shaft-type furnace, comprising: - a lifting column (2); - at least one star-shaped support (3) fixedly mounted on the lifting column (2) and comprising: - a hub (31); - at least three arms (32) integral with the hub (31) and extending outwards from the hub (31), characterized in that: - the hub (31) comprises for each arm (32), a clevis (34), - each arm (32) has: - a first end (324) intended to be fitted into a clevis (34) along an insertion axis (A2), - first locking means (326) intended to cooperate with second locking means (342) integral with the clevis (34) to lock the arm (32) in translation along the insertion axis (A2).