Modular Stereolithography Material Support for Metal Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current stereolithographic additive manufacturing machines for metallic components have a fixed build space, leading to inefficient material consumption, especially for expensive alloys or precious metals, as the base area of the build space must be fully utilized for each component, resulting in excess material usage and high costs.

Innovation Solution

A modular device with an exchangeable material support, build platform, and doctor blade, allowing for adaptation to the size and shape of the component, minimizing the amount of unpolymerized material used by selecting the appropriate configuration based on the component dimensions, thereby optimizing material feed and consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If a fixed build space is used in stereolithographic additive manufacturing, then the manufacturing process is simple and device structure is stable, but material consumption increases and costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial consumptionVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The material support is divided into multiple exchangeable modules, each with different build platform sizes. This segmentation allows the system to select the appropriate module size for each component, reducing material consumption while maintaining device stability through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The material support is made dynamically configurable through exchangeability. Different material supports can be installed depending on the component size requirements, transforming the static fixed build space into a dynamic adaptable system that optimizes material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the build platform size is increased to accommodate larger components, then manufacturing versatility improves, but material consumption increases for smaller components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing versatilityVSAvoidunpolymerized material consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The material support comes in multiple segmented size variants, allowing selection of the smallest appropriate size for each component. This eliminates the need to use an oversized build platform for small components, reducing unpolymerized material consumption while maintaining versatility through the available size range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The build platform dimensions are changed by exchanging material supports with different sized platforms. This parameter change allows optimization of material consumption for each specific component while maintaining manufacturing versatility across different component sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If exchangeable material supports are implemented, then material consumption is optimized, but device complexity and operation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunpolymerized material wasteVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The exchangeable material supports follow a universal interface design that allows different sized platforms to be used with the same device. This multi-functionality enables optimized material consumption across different component sizes while keeping the device structure and operation procedures relatively simple and consistent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This modular system reduces material waste and consumption by allowing for customizable configurations that match the component dimensions, minimizing the amount of unpolymerized material used in each manufacturing process, thereby lowering production costs and optimizing material usage.

Implementation Method 1

the material layer is exposed position selectively from above using an exposure unit to obtain a position selectively polymerized component layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS12151430B2Device, modular system and method for stereolithographic additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 INCUS GMBH
  • US12151430B2 patent drawing
  • US12151430B2 patent drawing
  • US12151430B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for the stereolithographic additive manufacturing of metallic components includes a material support for a material layer of a material to be polymerized, the surface of which forms a building plane, a material container for fresh material, which opens into the building plane via a material feed opening, a build platform movable between a position flush with the building plane and a lowered position perpendicular to the building plane, a doctor blade movable between the material container and the build platform for applying the material layer on the building plane, and an exposure unit for position-selective exposure of the material layer on the build platform or on a component partially built on the build platform. The material support is exchangeably arranged in the device.