Modular Stiffening Modules for Sheet Element Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for stiffening sheet elements in lightweight construction often result in oversizing, leading to unnecessary material consumption and increased weight, which in turn increases energy requirements and CO2 emissions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of stiffening modules with a flange and at least one web, attached sequentially along a load path determined by stress-optimized calculations, forming a non-rectilinear stiffening structure that can be manufactured using conventional processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If linear profiles are used for stiffening structures, then ease of manufacture is improved, but weight of the construction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidweight of construction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The stiffening structure is divided into multiple individual stiffening elements that are arranged sequentially along the load path. Each element can be manufactured separately using conventional processes and then assembled, allowing for weight optimization while maintaining ease of manufacture through modular construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-sectional properties of the stiffening elements are varied along the load path according to the local stress requirements. Elements are designed with different dimensions and shapes at different locations, allowing material to be placed only where needed, thus reducing overall weight while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If stiffening structures are oversized for local maximum stress, then strength is improved, but weight of the construction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidweight of construction
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Each stiffening element is designed with cross-sectional properties specifically optimized for the local maximum stress conditions at its position along the load path. This ensures that each element has sufficient strength for its specific location without being oversized for other areas, minimizing overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The load path and stress distribution are determined through preliminary stress-optimized calculations and simulations before manufacturing the stiffening elements. This allows the elements to be precisely sized for their specific locations, avoiding oversizing while ensuring adequate strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Weight of stationary object

If topology-optimized non-rectilinear load paths are implemented, then weight of construction is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of constructionVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex topology-optimized load path is segmented into a sequence of individual stiffening elements with relatively simple geometries. Each element maintains a simple cross-section that can be manufactured conventionally, while the overall non-rectilinear arrangement follows the optimized load path, achieving weight reduction without excessive manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional manufacturing methods are used for bionic structures, then ease of manufacture is improved, but manufacturing precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is divided into discrete stiffening elements that can be manufactured using conventional methods with standard tolerances. The modular nature allows each element to be produced independently with conventional precision, and the overall structural precision is achieved through the systematic arrangement and connection of these elements rather than requiring high precision in each individual component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250033317A1Stiffening structure and method for stiffening a sheet element
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 PHOTON AG
  • US20250033317A1 patent drawing
  • US20250033317A1 patent drawing
  • US20250033317A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for stiffening a sheet element is provided. In this regard, the method preferably includes a first step of providing stiffening modules that have a flange and at least one web. Furthermore, the stiffening modules are preferably attached to the sheet element sequentially along a load path, the stiffening modules are connected to each other via their respective flanges using connecting means and/or joining methods for a positive, frictional and/or materially bonded connection to form a stiffening structure, such that the stiffening modules have a combined effect, specifically stiffening and reinforcing the sheet element. A stiffening structure for a sheet element is also provided that includes stiffening modules arranged sequentially, and to a stiffening system including a stiffening structure and a sheet element.