Modular Substrate Processing System for Low-Volume MEMS Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost and complexity of semiconductor fabrication equipment, coupled with the impracticality for low-volume component designers to access or afford dedicated equipment, hinder the production of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) sensors and other low-volume components due to the industry's focus on high-volume production.

Innovation Solution

A modular and interchangeable substrate processing system optimized for smaller substrates (1-2 inches in diameter), allowing for various processing functions like deposition, etching, and ion implantation, with a lower assembly supporting fluid, electrical, and diagnostic connections, and upper assemblies that can be easily swapped to perform different fabrication processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If semiconductor fabrication equipment is designed for high-volume production with large substrates, then productivity and device cost are improved, but adaptability to low-volume components and equipment accessibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of devices produced per yearVSAvoidability to produce different volume components
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fabrication system is divided into separate functional modules (deposition module, etching module, sputtering module, ion implantation module) that can be independently selected and configured. Each module handles a specific fabrication process, allowing the system to be customized for different production volumes and component types without requiring complete equipment redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal chamber design with standardized interfaces that can accommodate multiple processing functions. The same basic chamber structure supports various upper assemblies for different fabrication processes, enabling a single system to serve both high-volume and low-volume production needs across different component types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If dedicated semiconductor fabrication equipment is purchased for low-volume components, then manufacturing capability is improved, but cost and financial burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing capability for low-volume componentsVSAvoidequipment cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple fabrication functions (deposition, etching, sputtering, ion implantation) are combined into a single integrated system with shared vacuum chambers, control systems, and support infrastructure. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate dedicated equipment for each process, reducing overall equipment cost and complexity while maintaining full manufacturing capability for low-volume components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If fabrication time is reserved at contract manufacturing companies, then production capability is improved, but temporal and financial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capabilityVSAvoidfabrication time cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables institutions to perform fabrication in-house using the modular equipment, eliminating dependence on external contract manufacturing companies. Users can directly operate the system to produce low-volume components according to their own schedules, reducing both temporal delays and financial costs associated with outsourcing fabrication services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If substrate size is increased to produce more devices per substrate, then productivity is improved, but adaptability to small substrates and system footprint worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of devices per substrateVSAvoidsystem footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs adjustable and reconfigurable components including variable substrate holder positions, movable processing heads, and adjustable process parameters. This dynamic capability allows the same system to efficiently process both small substrates for low-volume research applications and larger substrates for higher-volume production, adapting the effective processing area to match substrate size without requiring separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10883168B2Processing system for small substrates
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US10883168B2 patent drawing
  • US10883168B2 patent drawing
  • US10883168B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A substrate processing system that is optimized for the production of smaller volumes of semiconductor components is disclosed. To minimize cost, the substrate processing system is designed to accommodate smaller substrates, such as substrates having a diameter of roughly one inch. Additionally, the components of the substrate processing system are designed to be interchangeable, thereby further reducing cost and complexity. In certain embodiments, the substrate processing system comprises a lower assembly, which may be used with one or more upper assemblies. The lower assembly is used to support the substrate and provide many of the fluid, electrical, and sensor connections, while the upper assemblies include the apparatus required to perform a certain fabrication function. For example, different upper assemblies may exist for deposition, etching, sputtering and ion implantation.