Modular Support Structure for Adaptive Postural Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional support and containment structures for disabled individuals are inflexible and non-adjustable, failing to accommodate varying physiological needs and movements, and are not suitable for all types of pathologies or bodily structures, leading to inadequate support and increased storage complexity.

Innovation Solution

A modular support and containment structure with adjustable modular elements and transverse containment elements that can be customized to fit individual users, allowing for precise adjustment of rigidity and flexibility, with clamping mechanisms and attachment elements to secure the structure in place.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a single rigid frame structure is used, then structural stability is improved, but adaptability to different users and pathologies deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to different users
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into multiple modular elements that can be selectively assembled. Each module can be independently positioned and configured, allowing the structure to adapt to different user needs while maintaining stability through the modular connection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structure incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable components that can be modified based on user requirements. The modular elements can be repositioned along the longitudinal axis, and the level of rigidity can be adjusted by changing the configuration of connected modules, enabling dynamic adaptation to different pathologies and users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a fixed rigid structure is used, then support control is improved, but flexibility for movement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport controlVSAvoidflexibility for movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The structure allows dynamic adjustment of rigidity and flexibility by reconfiguring the modular elements. Users can adjust the position and connection of modules to achieve the desired balance between support control and movement flexibility based on their specific needs and activity level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The structural parameters such as rigidity, length, and configuration can be changed by adjusting the modular elements. This allows the structure to provide firm support when needed while maintaining flexibility for movement, resolving the contradiction between control and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a standardized structure is used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but personalization capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidpersonalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is designed as a set of standardized modular elements that can be manufactured using simple, repetitive processes. Each module is a standardized component that can be easily produced, while the combination of modules provides extensive personalization capability through selective assembly and configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular elements are designed to be universal components that can serve multiple functions and be configured for different users. The same basic modules can be assembled in various configurations to accommodate different pathologies, body types, and support requirements, achieving personalization without requiring custom manufacturing for each user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple warehouse pieces are used for customization, then adaptability is improved, but warehouse management complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidwarehouse management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structure uses a limited set of standardized modular elements that can be selectively assembled. This segmentation approach reduces the number of different piece types needed in the warehouse compared to fully custom solutions, while still providing extensive customization capability through different combinations of the same modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design allows for easy disassembly, reconfiguration, and reuse of components. Modules that have served their purpose can be easily separated and reused in different configurations, reducing the need for additional pieces and simplifying warehouse management through component recovery and reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS9216121B2Support and containment structure for persons
Publication Date: 2015.12.22 GALANTE MARCO
  • US9216121B2 patent drawing
  • US9216121B2 patent drawing
  • US9216121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A support and containment structure for persons comprises at least one support member which extends mainly along a longitudinal axis, and at least one containment element. The at least one containment element is assembled transversely on the at least one support member and is able to contain the trunk of the person. The at least one support member consists of a plurality of modular elements adjacent to each other, selectively adjustable in height and able to be clamped in a stable position by means of relative clamping means. The modular elements assume, in their entirety during use, a position substantially adapted to the trunk of the person in correspondence with his spine.