Modular Surface-Mounted Tips for 3D Mechanosynthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing atom manipulation techniques are limited to simple one- or two-dimensional structures and cannot manufacture complex, three-dimensional products, with previous methods lacking the ability to quickly, reliably, and accurately produce atomically-precise tips for mechanosynthesis.

Innovation Solution

The development of modular, surface-mounted tips with active sites, bodies, and legs, which can be synthesized in bulk and affixed to a presentation surface, allowing for efficient mechanosynthetic reactions without the need for tip swapping or recharge, and enabling the creation of atomically-precise, aperiodic structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If traditional atom manipulation techniques are used, then simple one- or two-dimensional structures can be created, but complex three-dimensional products cannot be manufactured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional two-dimensional surface manipulation to three-dimensional mechanosynthesis by positioning reactive tips at controlled heights above the surface. This vertical dimension enables the construction of complex 3D structures through sequential bond formation, allowing atoms to be assembled in three-dimensional space rather than confined to planar arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention divides the manufacturing process into discrete mechanosynthetic steps, where individual reactive tips perform specific bond-forming operations. Each tip is designed with a particular reactive atom at its apex, enabling modular assembly of complex structures through a sequence of targeted reactions rather than attempting to create entire structures in single steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If atomically-precise tips are manufactured using previous methods, then some manipulation capability is achieved, but the process is slow and unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetip precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-synthesizes tips with the desired reactive atoms positioned at their apexes before they are deployed for mechanosynthesis. This preliminary preparation ensures that each tip is ready for immediate use with the correct atomic configuration, eliminating the need for time-consuming in-situ manipulation and recharge operations during the actual manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs disposable tips that are pre-formed with specific reactive atoms and used once or limited times before being replaced. This approach trades the cost of manufacturing many simple tips against the time and complexity of repeatedly recharging and repositioning expensive atomically-precise tips, thereby increasing overall manufacturing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If tips are swapped frequently during mechanosynthesis, then different reactions can be performed, but the process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction diversityVSAvoidtip swapping time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs tips with universal applicability by positioning reactive atoms that can participate in multiple types of mechanosynthetic reactions. A single tip design can facilitate different bond-forming operations depending on the target molecule and reaction conditions, reducing the need to swap between specialized tips for different reaction types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the rapid and reliable manufacturing of complex, three-dimensional workpieces by providing a large number of atomically-precise tips on a surface, reducing the need for tip recharge and swapping, and allowing for the creation of aperiodic structures that cannot be produced with traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM, in which we include all related techniques such as AFM, STM and many others) laboratories have been manipulating individual atoms and molecules for decades.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScanning Probe Microscopy: Scanning Probe Microscopy

Implementation Method 2

Mechanosynthesis is the use of positional control and mechanical force to facilitate site-specific chemical reactions involved in the building, alteration, or disassembly of a workpiece.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10822229B2Systems and methods for mechanosynthesis
Publication Date: 2020.11.03 CBN NANO TECH INC
  • US10822229B2 patent drawing
  • US10822229B2 patent drawing
  • US10822229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved methods, systems and devices for mechanosynthesis, including those that involve the bulk chemical preparation of tips, multiple tips on a presentation surface, and multiple tips used sequentially in a thermodynamic cascade. These improvements can simplify starting requirements, improve versatility, and reduce equipment and process complexity.