Modular Symmetrical Chassis for Machinery Part Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machinery designs for construction, agricultural, and domestic applications are complex and costly due to the use of numerous different parts, which increases manufacturing and assembly complexity.

Innovation Solution

A modular power unit with a symmetrical frame that uses identical side frames and spanning parts, allowing for reduced part counts and simplified design, featuring a centrally mounted engine for low center of gravity and high stability, and incorporating oscillating axles and hydraulic systems for efficient power transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional machinery designs use numerous different parts, then functional requirements are met, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing complexityVSAvoidpart count
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is divided into modular chassis portions (front and rear) that can be independently manufactured and then assembled. Each chassis portion contains integrated components, allowing the overall system to be built from standardized modules rather than numerous unique parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chassis portions are designed to be substantially identical, making each module universal and interchangeable. This multi-functionality allows the same basic structure to serve different positions and functions in the assembled machine, reducing the total variety of parts needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If identical chassis portions are used for front and rear, then part complexity is reduced, but specific functional requirements for different ends must be accommodated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechassis part varietyVSAvoidend-specific functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

While the overall chassis portions are identical, local modifications are made at specific locations (front vs. rear ends) to accommodate different functional requirements. This allows the majority of the structure to remain standardized while providing necessary functional differentiation where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The identical chassis portions are designed with flexibility to accommodate different configurations and attachments at each end, allowing the system to adapt to various functional requirements while maintaining structural standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8939250B2Self-powered apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 DEERE & CO
  • US8939250B2 patent drawing
  • US8939250B2 patent drawing
  • US8939250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Self-powered apparatus are disclosed. An example apparatus includes a front chassis portion and a rear chassis portion. The front chassis portion is to be coupled to the rear chassis portion. The front chassis portion is substantially the same as the rear chassis portion. When the front and rear chassis portions are coupled, the front chassis portion includes a first end of the apparatus and the rear chassis portion includes a second end of the apparatus.