Modular Laboratory Tabletop Layout for Robot Arm Clearance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laboratory tables with continuous surfaces are inadequate for accommodating tall apparatuses in automated systems, as they obstruct the movement of robot arms with pipette tips, and require complex modifications to accommodate varying equipment configurations.

Innovation Solution

A modular laboratory table design featuring a frame with interchangeable tabletop elements, equipped with detent rails and clamping levers, allowing for customizable work surface configurations to accommodate different apparatuses and workflows, with secondary work levels that can be added below or above the main work level to minimize robot arm interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a continuous laboratory tabletop is used, then the work surface is stable and provides precise positioning, but tall apparatuses obstruct robot arm movements and require complex modifications to accommodate different equipment configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different equipment configurationsVSAvoidcomplexity of table modifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous tabletop is divided into multiple interchangeable tabletop elements that can be selectively positioned on the frame. Each element can be independently installed or removed, allowing the work surface to be reconfigured for different equipment arrangements without modifying the entire table structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tabletop elements are designed to be dynamically reconfigurable, allowing users to change the work surface layout by replacing elements rather than permanently modifying the table. This dynamic adaptability enables the same base frame to support various experimental configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If openings are sawn into the continuous tabletop to access apparatus below, then robot arms can access equipment, but the structural integrity and positioning precision of the tabletop is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to apparatus below work surfaceVSAvoidpositioning precision of pipette tips
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of cutting openings in a continuous surface, the tabletop is segmented into removable elements. Specific elements can be removed or replaced with transparent variants to create access points, maintaining the precision of the remaining solid surface for pipetting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Transparent tabletop elements act as intermediaries, allowing robot arms to access apparatus below while maintaining a solid, precise work surface above. The transparent material enables visual alignment and positioning precision while permitting mechanical access through the element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If tall apparatuses are placed on the work surface, then they can be accommodated, but they obstruct the movement of robot arms with pipette tips

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of tall apparatusesVSAvoidefficiency of liquid handling operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The solution moves tall apparatuses from the primary work surface level to secondary work levels below or above the main tabletop. This vertical dimensionality change allows robot arms to maintain unobstructed horizontal movement paths while tall equipment is positioned at different elevations on the same frame structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The work surface configuration is made dynamic through interchangeable elements, allowing the layout to be optimized for each specific experimental setup. Tall apparatuses can be accommodated by configuring elements to create secondary levels, while maintaining efficient robot arm pathways when not in use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If a modular tabletop element system is implemented, then flexibility and adaptability are improved, but the complexity of the frame structure and positioning mechanisms increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of work surface configurationVSAvoidcomplexity of frame and positioning mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure is segmented with standardized mounting locations and detent rails that simplify the positioning mechanism. Each tabletop element corresponds to a specific module type, reducing the complexity of the positioning system through standardization rather than requiring complex adjustable mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure is designed as a universal platform with standardized detent rails and mounting points that work with all tabletop elements. This multi-functionality reduces the need for element-specific positioning mechanisms, simplifying the overall system despite its modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8584602B2Laboratory table having tabletop elements
Publication Date: 2013.11.19 TECAN TRADING AG
  • US8584602B2 patent drawing
  • US8584602B2 patent drawing
  • US8584602B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A laboratory table has a frame with a front frame part and a rear frame part and replaceable tabletop elements positionable on the frame. A detent rail is arranged on the front or rear frame part, having detent openings. Each of these detent openings is for the insertion and sliding guiding of a detent bolt of a tabletop element. In addition, the tabletop elements has at least one detent bolt for insertion and sliding guiding in one of the detent openings of these detent rails. Each tabletop element has at least one fixing mechanism, which is spaced apart from the detent bolt, and which fixes the tabletop element in a locking position and holds the detent bolts, which are guided parallel to a plate axis of the tabletop element in the detent rail in a fixing position.