Modular Telescoping Surgical Instrument With Adjustable Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical instruments for orthopedic surgery often lack configuration flexibility, which limits their utility and requires multiple instruments for different procedures, whereas tools that can be customized to individual preferences are more versatile and efficient.

Innovation Solution

A modular telescoping surgical instrument with a retention mechanism that allows adjustable length and conversion between bayonet and non-bayonet versions, utilizing a collet and threaded knob to securely fix the working end relative to the handle, enabling length adjustment and configuration flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If surgical instruments are made static in configuration, then manufacturing and operation are simplified, but configuration flexibility and versatility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidinstrument structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical instrument is divided into modular components including a handle, a telescoping shaft with multiple segments, and a working end. These segments can be independently adjusted and reconfigured, allowing the instrument to adapt to different surgical procedures while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized connection interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The instrument incorporates dynamic adjustment mechanisms including a telescoping shaft with adjustable length segments and a rotatable working end that can be positioned at different angles. These dynamic features allow real-time reconfiguration during surgical procedures to match specific surgical needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple surgical instruments are used to provide configuration flexibility, then adaptability is improved, but the quantity of instruments and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure-specific configurationVSAvoidnumber of instruments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical instrument is designed as a universal platform that can perform multiple surgical functions through a single instrument. The handle accommodates various working ends, the telescoping shaft provides adjustable length for different access requirements, and the rotatable joint enables different approach angles, eliminating the need for multiple specialized instruments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the working end is made adjustable relative to the handle, then configuration flexibility is improved, but the retention and securing mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelength adjustmentVSAvoidretention mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retention mechanism uses a separate threaded fastener that can be independently adjusted and secured. This extracted retention component allows length adjustment of the telescoping shaft while maintaining a simple, reliable securing mechanism that does not complicate the overall instrument design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular design reduces the number of instruments needed by allowing surgeons to customize the length and configuration of the surgical instrument, enhancing its versatility and utility in various surgical procedures.

Implementation Method 1

the knob axially compresses the collet towards and into the internal angled walls of the neck of the front portion of the handle thereby causing axial flanges of the collet to radially compress around and against a portion of the working end to fix the working end relative to the handle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical compression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

radially compress around and against a portion of the working end to fix the working end relative to the handle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

The threaded knob is received on a threaded end of the neck of the handle and at the proximate end of the collet. As the threaded knob is received on the neck of the handle, the knob axially compresses the collet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreaded fastening: Screw

Implementation Method 4

the knob axially compresses the collet towards and into the internal angled walls of the neck of the front portion of the handle thereby causing axial flanges of the collet to radially compress around and against a portion of the working end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage through angled surfaces: Wedge

Data Source

PatentUS9610100B2Modular telescoping surgical instrument
Publication Date: 2017.04.04 LIFE SPINE INC
  • US9610100B2 patent drawing
  • US9610100B2 patent drawing
  • US9610100B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surgical instrument provides rotational and axial variations of a working end relative to a handle of the surgical instrument for configuration flexibility of the working end. An internal configuration of the handle of the surgical instrument accepts a retention portion of the working end in several positions. The working end can be varied in axial length relative to a front end of the handle and in axial position relative to the extension of the working end from the front end of the handle. A retention mechanism interacts with the handle and the working end to fix a position of the working end in the handle. The working end may be shaped to provide a bayonet version wherein the working end extends from the front end of the handle offset from the handle's longitudinal center, and a non-bayonet version wherein the working end extends from the handle's longitudinal center.