Modular Computing Device Test Frame for Parallel Functional Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing computing devices are complicated, time-consuming, and expensive, particularly when dealing with devices that require different operating systems and functionalities.

Innovation Solution

A modular testing system with an aluminum frame that houses a shield box for multiple computing devices, equipped with testing components like cameras, microphones, and robotic arms, which can perform simultaneous functional tests and determine results for display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional testing methods are used for computing devices, then testing can be performed, but the process becomes complicated, time-consuming, and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting functionalityVSAvoidtesting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system is divided into modular components including a testing frame with multiple testing cabinets, each capable of housing and testing computing devices independently. This segmentation allows the complex testing process to be broken down into manageable units that can be configured and executed separately, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive testing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The testing frame and cabinets are designed as universal platforms that can accommodate different types of computing devices (laptops, desktops, tablets) and support multiple testing functions through standardized interfaces and configurations. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate specialized testing equipment for each device type, simplifying the testing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If comprehensive functional tests are performed on multiple computing devices, then testing thoroughness is improved, but testing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional test coverageVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple testing functions and multiple computing devices are merged into a single integrated testing frame that operates simultaneously. The testing frame houses multiple testing cabinets that can conduct different tests on different devices at the same time, combining comprehensive testing coverage with parallel processing to reduce total testing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system is designed to operate continuously with multiple devices being tested simultaneously in different cabinets. This continuous operation eliminates idle time between tests and allows the testing frame to maintain constant productivity, reducing the total time required to complete comprehensive functional testing across multiple devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple computing devices with different operating systems are tested, then testing versatility is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compatibilityVSAvoidsoftware configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing frame provides a universal platform that supports multiple operating systems (Windows, macOS, Linux) and various device types through standardized testing interfaces and configurations. This universality allows the same hardware platform to adapt to different software environments without requiring separate specialized testing systems for each operating system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system incorporates dynamic configuration capabilities that allow testing parameters, interfaces, and configurations to be adjusted according to the specific device being tested. This dynamic adaptability enables the system to automatically configure appropriate test protocols for different operating systems and device types, reducing manual configuration complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12511210B2Apparatus and method for testing a plurality of computing devices
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 COMMUNICATIONS TEST DESIGN INC
  • US12511210B2 patent drawing
  • US12511210B2 patent drawing
  • US12511210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application relates to apparatus and methods for testing one or more computing devices. In one example, a testing system includes a testing frame with at least one testing cabinet for housing a computing device under test. The testing cabinet can also include testing equipment such as a camera, a microphone, a speaker, a color test sheet, and an ambient light sensor. Further, the testing frame includes a control cabinet for housing a testing computing device, where the testing computing device is communicatively coupled, through one or more hubs, to each computing device under test. The testing frame may also include a bracket that secures a monitor and a keyboard, where the monitor and keyboard are communicatively coupled to the testing computing device. The testing computing device can control the testing equipment to test various functions of the computing device under test, an may generate status based on the tests.