Modular Tissue Construct Fabrication for Parallel Bioprinting Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bioprinters face challenges in integrating diverse processes and scaling up for high-throughput production of synthetic tissue constructs, as they are designed for small-scale laboratory use and suffer from serial processing limitations, requiring frequent manual intervention and being unable to produce complex tissue constructs efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A modular additive manufacturing system with multiple stations for simultaneous material dispensing on multiple platforms, allowing for synchronous or asynchronous operation, and incorporating inspection stations to reduce manual intervention and increase production efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional bioprinters use serial processing with a single dispensing station, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity is severely limited and throughput is low

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the single dispensing function into multiple independent dispensing stations (first, second, third stations) that operate in parallel. Each station has its own dispensing mechanism and can work on different constructs simultaneously, transforming a serial process into a parallel one to dramatically increase throughput without requiring each individual station to be overly complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple dispensing stations are integrated into a single unified system that can handle various material types and dispensing methods (extrusion, electrospinning, inkjet). The system provides universal functionality across all stations, allowing them to perform different specialized functions while being coordinated through a common control architecture, thereby managing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If conventional bioprinters operate with idle periods between dispensing operations, then energy consumption is reduced, but extrusion tip clogging increases due to material stagnation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclogging incidenceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple dispensing stations operate continuously and simultaneously, ensuring that material flows constantly through all dispensing tips without idle periods. By having multiple stations working in parallel, the system maintains continuous useful action across the entire system, preventing material stagnation and clogging while the coordinated operation manages energy consumption through efficient resource utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If manual intervention is used to replace syringes and remove constructs, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity decreases and contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmanual intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates automatic construct removal mechanisms and syringe replacement capabilities that allow the bioprinter to service itself without human intervention. The system can autonomously detect when constructs are complete, remove them from the build platform, and replace depleted syringes, enabling continuous operation and dramatically improving productivity while reducing contamination risk from manual handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors and monitoring mechanisms to detect the state of constructs and material supplies in real-time. This feedback enables automatic control of the dispensing process, triggering syringe replacement or construct removal at appropriate moments without manual intervention, thereby maintaining ease of operation while maximizing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If inspection is performed between each layer, then measurement precision and quality control are improved, but productivity decreases due to production slowdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidproduction throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection function is segmented into separate, dedicated inspection stations that operate independently from the dispensing stations. Multiple inspection stations can simultaneously examine different constructs or different layers, allowing quality control to proceed in parallel with production rather than sequentially, thereby maintaining high measurement precision without reducing overall throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Inspection is performed at multiple intermediate stages during construct fabrication, with inspection stations examining layers as they are being built. This preliminary inspection approach allows for early detection of defects while the construct is still being formed, enabling quality control without requiring complete construction before inspection, thus maintaining both precision and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240150690A1Methods of Tissue Construct Fabrication Using a Modular Production System
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 STIRLING RALPH L
  • US20240150690A1 patent drawing
  • US20240150690A1 patent drawing
  • US20240150690A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing tissue constructs formed of one or more materials, dispensed or applied in patterned layers on two or more platforms, build plates or print surfaces by two or more stations, performing dispensing, mechanical modification, chemical modification, biological modification, or inspection operations. The platforms are positioned relative to the stations and station operations are directed by signals from a controller causing station operations on platforms to be performed simultaneously, for each patterned layer until all layers have been applied in sequence.