Wall hanging system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wall hanging systems lack versatility and efficiency in accommodating a variety of tools, particularly power tools, as they often require specific mounting attachments that do not universally fit different tools and storage systems like slatwalls and pegboards.

Innovation Solution

A tool hanging system with modular mount receiving portions and mounting attachments that can be selectively engaged with various tools, including power tools, allowing for secure hanging on slatwalls and pegboards, and featuring adjustable slots and projections to accommodate different tool designs and storage configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional wall hanging systems use specific mounting attachments for each tool, then each tool can be securely mounted, but the system lacks versatility and requires multiple different attachments

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveversatilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting attachment is designed with a universal interface that can accommodate multiple tool types through a standardized mount receiving portion. The attachment includes adjustable slots and projections that can be configured to fit different tool shapes and sizes, allowing a single attachment design to serve multiple functions across different tool categories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting attachment is divided into modular components including separate slots, projections, and engagement features that can be independently adjusted or reconfigured. This segmentation allows the same attachment to be adapted for different tools by repositioning or reconfiguring the modular elements rather than requiring completely different attachments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the mounting attachment is designed to fit all tool types, then versatility is improved, but the secure fit and mounting reliability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveversatilityVSAvoidmounting reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting attachment incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable elements that can be dynamically adapted to match the specific geometry of each tool. The slots can be positioned at different locations and the projections can be adjusted to create optimal engagement points, ensuring reliable mounting for each specific tool configuration while maintaining universal compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting attachment features locally optimized engagement zones with varying slot configurations, projection shapes, and engagement mechanisms tailored to different tool types. Each local region of the attachment can be configured to provide the appropriate fit and security for the specific tool being mounted, ensuring reliable performance across diverse tool applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If multiple specific mounting attachments are used for different tools, then mounting reliability is maintained, but storage efficiency and space utilization decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting reliabilityVSAvoidstorage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

A single mounting attachment design serves multiple tool types, eliminating the need for separate attachments for each tool. This universal attachment can be repeatedly used across different tools without compromising mounting reliability, thereby increasing storage efficiency by reducing the number of unique components needed and optimizing wall space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If the mounting system uses fixed slots and projections, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptability to different tool designs is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting attachment uses segmented slots and projections that can be independently positioned or reconfigured. While each individual slot and projection can be manufactured using standard processes, their modular arrangement allows for flexible configuration to accommodate different tool designs, balancing manufacturing simplicity with adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The slots and projections are designed to be reconfigurable or adjustable rather than fixed in rigid positions. This allows the same manufactured components to be adapted to different tool designs through repositioning or reconfiguration, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while enhancing adaptability to various tool geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10500713B2Wall hanging system
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • US10500713B2 patent drawing
  • US10500713B2 patent drawing
  • US10500713B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool hanging system including a first tool having a first mount receiving portion and a second tool having a second mount receiving portion. A first mounting attachment is engaged with the first mount receiving portion and a second mounting attachment engaged with the second mount receiving portion. The tool hanging system further includes a wall panel. The first mounting attachment can hang on the wall panel so that the first tool is hung on the wall panel and the second mounting attachment can hang on the wall panel so that the second tool is hung on the wall panel.