Modular Tool Control With Local Processing and Self-Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robotic manufacturing systems rely on centralized control systems, which are complex, costly, and inefficient, requiring extensive updates and calibration, leading to high maintenance costs and downtime due to the lack of localized processing and control in end-effectors.

Innovation Solution

A self-contained modular manufacturing device with a local processor that controls end-effectors independently, allowing for self-calibration and communication with a master control system, reducing the need for bulky central control systems and enabling modular device updates and calibration without disrupting the entire manufacturing system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If centralized control systems are used to control end-effectors, then control functionality is centralized, but processing speed and power requirements on the master control system increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidpower requirements on master control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into a master control system and local processors embedded in end-effectors. The local processors handle tool-specific control functions independently, while the master control system manages high-level coordination. This segmentation reduces the processing burden and power requirements on the master control system by distributing control functionality to localized units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If centralized control systems are used, then master logic programs control all tools, but system downtime and maintenance costs increase due to lack of localized processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Local processors in end-effectors are pre-configured with tool-specific control logic and can operate autonomously. This preliminary setup allows the system to continue operating with localized control even if the master control system experiences issues or requires maintenance, thereby reducing system downtime and improving overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If conventional controllable tools are mounted to robotic arms, then tools can be controlled, but the tools lack self-contained processing ability and require extensive calibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool controllabilityVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

End-effectors are equipped with embedded local processors that provide self-contained processing ability. These local processors enable the tools to perform self-calibration and self-diagnosis functions, eliminating the need for extensive manual calibration and reducing the complexity of tool setup and maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Extent of automation

If master programs control all end-effectors, then centralized control is achieved, but processing speed requirements on the master control system increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidprocessing speed on master control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The automated control system is divided into hierarchical levels: the master control system handles high-level automation coordination, while local processors in end-effectors handle real-time tool control and processing. This segmentation enables high-speed localized processing without overwhelming the master control system, maintaining high automation levels while managing processing speed requirements effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3359352B1Modular manufacturing device and tool module for the modular manufacturing device
Publication Date: 2024.08.28 AIRBUS ROBOTICS LLC
  • EP3359352B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3359352B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3359352B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for a self-contained self-calibrating modular manufacturing device having modular tools and parts configured to collectively accomplish a specific task or function. The modular device includes a housing that has a mount configured to engage a robotic arm or other form of maneuvering actuator (such a crane or gantry). The housing may provide a base by which additional modules may be mounted and coupled. The modular device also includes an interface configured to communicate with a remote control system capable of controlling the robotic arm. Such modules work in conjunction with each other to accomplish tasks and functions. In a self-contained self-calibrating modular manufacturing device, a processor disposed in the housing may be configured to control the functional tools (e.g., each end-effector) independent of the overall manufacturing control system as well as use local sensors to determine aspects of an underlying manufactured items for calibration purposes.