Modular Transmit Controller With Adjustable MFED Holder

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Model vehicle transmit controllers face challenges in securely accommodating portable multi-function electronic devices (MFEDs) of varying sizes, as existing designs are not adaptable and require additional costly hardware for communication, making it difficult to upgrade existing controllers to be MFED-enabled.

Innovation Solution

A modular transmit controller design featuring a user interface module with a steering control, throttle control, and an attachment portion for an external device module, including a holder mechanism with adjustable sliding plates and springs to securely hold MFEDs of different sizes, and the ability to be upgraded by swapping base modules for MFED compatibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed size space is used to accommodate MFED, then the structure is simple, but it cannot accommodate MFEDs of varying sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of MFEDs of varying sizesVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The holder mechanism employs movable components including sliding plates that can move along guide rails and spring-loaded arms that can flex and extend. These dynamic elements allow the holder to adapt its internal dimensions to accommodate MFEDs of varying sizes while maintaining a compact external form factor, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The holder mechanism is divided into separate functional segments: sliding plates for horizontal adjustment, spring-loaded arms for vertical compression, and adjustable clamps for securing. This segmentation allows each component to independently adjust to different MFED dimensions, providing versatility without requiring a completely complex monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional hardware components are added for MFED communication, then MFED functionality is enabled, but the cost of the transmit controller increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMFED compatibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The transmit controller incorporates universal communication interfaces and modular hardware components that can work with multiple types of MFEDs. The base unit includes standardized connectors and processing capabilities that remain functional even when MFEDs are not attached, allowing the same hardware to serve both standalone and MFED-integrated modes, thereby reducing overall manufacturing costs compared to dedicated MFED-only designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The MFED communication and control components are nested within the existing transmit controller architecture rather than requiring separate dedicated hardware. The controller can operate in a simplified mode without MFED integration, and only the necessary additional components are activated or physically connected when an MFED is attached, reducing the average manufacturing cost across all product configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If MFED is held securely to prevent accidental separation, then reliability is improved, but the complexity of the attachment mechanism increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure attachment of MFEDVSAvoidattachment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The holder mechanism utilizes curved guide rails and arc-shaped spring-loaded arms that naturally guide the MFED into proper alignment and provide progressive securing force. The curved geometry allows the simple spring mechanisms to achieve reliable holding through geometric constraint rather than complex mechanical locking, maintaining reliability while minimizing attachment mechanism complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded arms and sliding plate mechanism are designed to automatically adjust and secure the MFED based on its insertion. The springs provide self-regulating force that adapts to different MFED sizes, and the sliding plates self-align through the guide rails, eliminating the need for complex manual adjustment mechanisms or multiple separate securing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9333437B2Modular transmit controller
Publication Date: 2016.05.10 TRAXXAS
  • US9333437B2 patent drawing
  • US9333437B2 patent drawing
  • US9333437B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a modular transmit controller is provided. The modular transmit controller has a user interface module including a steering control, a throttle control, and an attachment portion for attachment of an external device module.