Modular 3D-Printed Transport Frames Beyond AM Build Size Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The use of additive manufacturing (AM) in transport structures has been limited to producing small-scale components, with untapped potential for larger and more sophisticated substructures due to constraints in build size, precision, and integration with existing manufacturing processes.

Innovation Solution

The application of AM techniques such as Direct Metal Deposition (DMD) and Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) to print entire frames and bodies of transport structures, combined with modular design and multi-aspect printing, allowing for the integration of various components and efficient recycling of materials, enabling the production of complex and customizable transport structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additive manufacturing is used to produce transport structure components, then design flexibility and customization are improved, but build size limitations prevent production of large-scale structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidbuild size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The transport structure is divided into multiple modular components that can be additively manufactured separately within build size constraints, then assembled into a complete large-scale structure. This segmentation allows each component to be produced within the limitations of current AM technology while the overall structure achieves the desired large scale and design flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Shape

If additive manufacturing is used for transport structures, then production of complex geometries is improved, but manufacturing precision and integration with existing processes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex geometryVSAvoidprecision
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Complex transport structures are segmented into multiple components that can be manufactured with higher precision using AM. Each segmented component maintains geometric complexity while reducing overall dimensional tolerance accumulation, thereby improving manufacturing precision while preserving design freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Additive manufacturing processes are integrated with existing manufacturing workflows by combining AM-produced complex components with traditionally manufactured parts. This hybrid approach allows complex geometries to be produced where AM provides advantage while maintaining precision requirements through established processes for critical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of substance

If entire frames and bodies are printed using AM, then material recycling efficiency is improved, but production time and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial recycling efficiencyVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than printing entire frames and bodies as single monolithic components, the structure is segmented into multiple smaller components that can be manufactured in parallel. This reduces build time for each component while maintaining high material utilization rates, and enables more efficient powder recycling through smaller, manageable build volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of additively manufacturing every component of a transport structure, AM is applied selectively to specific components where geometric complexity provides the greatest value. This partial application reduces overall production time and process complexity while still achieving significant material recycling benefits in the AM-produced portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of larger, complex transport structures with enhanced safety features, improved repairability, and reduced production costs, while allowing for customization and efficient recycling, thereby maximizing production efficiency and flexibility.

Implementation Method 1

DMD is an AM technology that uses a laser to melt metallic powder and thereby transform it into a solid metal object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

Other AM processes such as powder bed fusion (PBF) use a laser to sinter or melt powdered material, which then bonds the powder particles together in targeted areas to produce a 3-D structure having the desired geometry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser sintering: Selective Laser Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS20240139994A1Methods and apparatus for additively manufactured endoskeleton-based transport structures
Publication Date: 2024.05.02 DIVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20240139994A1 patent drawing
  • US20240139994A1 patent drawing
  • US20240139994A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments of the present disclosure relate to an additively manufactured transport structure. The transport structure includes cavities into which components that use an external interface are inserted. A plurality of components are assembled and integrated into the vehicle. In an embodiment, the components and frame are modular, enabling reparability and replacement of single parts in the event of isolated failures.