Modular Truss Framework Using Tetrahedral Unit Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional three-dimensional truss structures face challenges in standardization and stability due to varying angles of flanges in modular units, and require multiple types of members for assembly, leading to inefficiencies in construction and potential diagonal misalignment of walls and roofs.

Innovation Solution

A modularized framework structure where unit modules are interconnected using elongated joining surfaces that conform to regular tetrahedral or octahedral shapes, allowing for the formation of stable truss structures without additional joint members, enabling vertical and horizontal construction at right angles and enhancing structural strength through overlapping frames.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional modular units with varying flange angles are used, then construction flexibility is improved, but standardization and manufacturing precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction flexibilityVSAvoidstandardization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the modular units by using regular tetrahedral or octahedral shapes with standardized edge lengths and joining surface orientations. This standardization allows all units to be manufactured with identical specifications while still achieving construction flexibility through the geometric properties of the regular polyhedra themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized modular units with elongated joining surfaces can serve multiple functions in construction - they can be assembled in various configurations to form different structural shapes and orientations. The universal design allows the same unit type to be used throughout the entire structure, eliminating the need for multiple specialized component types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple types of members are used for assembly, then structural adaptability is improved, but device complexity and construction efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural adaptabilityVSAvoidnumber of member types
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs a universal modular unit design where identical tetrahedral or octahedral units with standardized elongated joining surfaces can be assembled in various configurations to create different structural forms. This single unit type replaces the need for multiple specialized members, simplifying inventory management and assembly procedures while maintaining structural adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Strength

If additional joint members are used for connection, then connection strength is improved, but device complexity and construction time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the joining function directly into the modular units themselves through the elongated joining surfaces. These surfaces are integrated features of the tetrahedral or octahedral units, eliminating the need for separate joint members. The joining surfaces provide both the connection interface and the structural strength needed for assembling the framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If conventional modular units are used, then construction speed is improved, but structural stability and alignment precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction speedVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the modular units to regular tetrahedral or octahedral shapes with standardized edge lengths and specifically oriented elongated joining surfaces. These geometric parameters are chosen to ensure that when units are assembled, their faces align at precise right angles, providing inherent structural stability and preventing diagonal misalignment while maintaining fast assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240301676A1Modularized framework structure and unit module for use in the same
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 TETRAMODULE CO LTD
  • US20240301676A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301676A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301676A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A modularized framework structure of a three-dimensional truss structure is obtained as a result of making unit modules and interconnecting the unit modules. Each of the unit modules is made of frames, having elongated joining surfaces and connected mutually at end portions, to conform to a regular tetrahedron or octahedron. The elongated joining surfaces are obtained as a result of planarly truncating surfaces of edges of the frames corresponding to ridgelines of the regular tetrahedron or octahedron such that the elongated joining surfaces can be joined mutually, and the elongated joining surfaces are oriented orthogonally to perpendiculars drawn from the center to the corner centers of the elongated joining surfaces to form a Tetra- or Octa-module. The unit modules as the Tetra- or Octa-module are interconnected by joining mutually the elongated joining surfaces of the frames thereby to form the three-dimensional truss structure.