Temporary Support Stand With Stackable Pad Base for Modular Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wood temporary support stands for modular units are expensive, labor-intensive, heavy, difficult to adjust and transport, and prone to damage and deterioration, leading to inefficiencies and safety concerns in construction sites.

Innovation Solution

A stackable, reusable, and easily transportable support stand designed with a top and bottom portion, elevating legs, and a pad system that allows for efficient stacking and deployment, constructed from durable materials with engineering specifications to ensure stability and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If wood temporary support stands are used, then they can support modular units above the ground, but they are heavy and difficult to move and lift

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of support standVSAvoidease of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The support stand is divided into multiple detachable components including legs, cross braces, and platform sections that can be separated for easy transport and reassembled at the destination. This segmentation allows workers to handle lighter individual pieces rather than moving entire heavy wooden structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support stand incorporates collapsible legs and foldable cross braces that can transition between extended and retracted configurations. This dynamic design allows the structure to be compacted for transport and then expanded to full size for use, significantly improving mobility while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If wood temporary support stands are used, then they can support modular units, but they are expensive and labor intensive to build

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The support stand consists of pre-fabricated modular components with standardized connection points that can be quickly assembled without requiring specialized construction skills. Each component is designed for simple attachment, reducing both labor intensity and assembly time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple structural elements are combined into integrated assemblies where cross braces incorporate connection mechanisms for both the legs and platform. This merging reduces the number of separate assembly steps and simplifies the overall construction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Volume of moving object

If wood temporary support stands are used, then they can support modular units, but they are expensive to transport due to volume of space occupied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport volumeVSAvoidnumber of stands needed
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The support stand components are designed to nest within each other when collapsed, with smaller elements fitting inside larger ones. This nesting configuration dramatically reduces the volume required for transport and storage, allowing more stands to be moved in the same space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The collapsible design allows the support stands to transition from a large extended configuration during use to a compact folded configuration for transport. This dynamic volume reduction minimizes transportation costs and optimizes space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If wood temporary support stands are used, then they can support modular units, but the materials deteriorate rapidly from exposure to elements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The support stand uses composite construction combining corrosion-resistant metal components for the structural frame with weather-resistant materials for the platform and cross braces. This composite approach provides superior resistance to environmental degradation compared to traditional wood construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The material selection and protective coatings are engineered to maintain structural properties over extended periods of exposure to various environmental conditions. This parameter optimization ensures consistent performance and extended service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Reliability

If wood temporary support stands are used, then they can support modular units, but they are prone to break and damage from use and storage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidsusceptibility to damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The use of high-strength metal components and engineered materials provides superior resistance to impact and mechanical damage during handling, transport, and storage. These materials maintain structural integrity under conditions that would damage traditional wood construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The modular component design isolates potential damage to individual parts, allowing damaged sections to be replaced without compromising the entire structure. This segmentation also reduces stress concentration points that could lead to catastrophic failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

6Reliability

If wood temporary support stands are used, then they can support modular units, but the stability and dependability vary due to craftsmanship quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance consistencyVSAvoidconstruction quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The support stand is manufactured as pre-assembled modular components with standardized dimensions and pre-installed connection hardware. This segmentation allows for controlled factory manufacturing with consistent quality standards, eliminating variability from on-site craftsmanship.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple structural elements are pre-assembled into integrated units with built-in connection mechanisms that ensure consistent alignment and stability. This merging of components during controlled manufacturing processes guarantees uniform performance across all units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11466810B2Temporary support stand for a volumetric modular unit
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 MODCRIBS LLC
  • US11466810B2 patent drawing
  • US11466810B2 patent drawing
  • US11466810B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A support stand for supporting a volumetric modular unit above the ground is disclosed. The support stand includes a top portion with a top surface for contacting and supporting an underside of the modular unit above the ground. A bottom portion with a bottom surface supports the top portion at an elevation above the ground against the underside of the modular unit. An elevating portion has a top side connected to the top portion, a bottom side connected to the bottom portion, and an elevating span between the top side and the bottom side. A pad is connected to the bottom portion. The pad has a bottom surface for contacting and supporting the bottom portion against the ground, an inner pad perimeter and an outer pad perimeter. The top surface is parallel with the bottom surface. The underside and weight of the modular unit is supported on the top surface.