Modular Valve Controller Segmentation for Hazardous Area Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flow control devices, such as valve assemblies, face challenges in meeting both explosion-proof and intrinsically-safe design standards, particularly when operating in hazardous areas with flammable or combustible materials, as they often require complex and costly design modifications to prevent ignition and ensure safety.

Innovation Solution

A modular controller design that separates functional elements into independent, operative modules, combining explosion-proof and intrinsically-safe configurations to regulate fluid flow, featuring a safety barrier that limits energy signals and separates pneumatic functions to prevent pressurized air ingress, thus meeting both safety standards while simplifying design and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a controller is designed to meet both explosion-proof and intrinsically-safe standards, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is divided into two separate modules: an intrinsically-safe control module and an explosion-proof I/O module. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized for its specific safety requirement, simplifying the overall design while meeting both safety standards simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A safety barrier is introduced as an intermediary component between the intrinsically-safe control module and the explosion-proof I/O module. The safety barrier limits energy transmission and prevents hazardous interactions, enabling the controller to meet both safety standards without requiring a single complex design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If safety barriers and modular design are implemented, then meeting safety standards becomes easier, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidmodular design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is divided into two separate modules: an intrinsically-safe control module and an explosion-proof I/O module. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized for its specific safety requirement, simplifying the overall design while meeting both safety standards simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety barrier serves multiple functions: it limits energy transmission, isolates hazardous areas, and enables compliance with both safety standards. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components, simplifying manufacturing despite the modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If pneumatic functions are separated, then pressurized air ingress is prevented, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is divided into two separate modules: an intrinsically-safe control module and an explosion-proof I/O module. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized for its specific safety requirement, simplifying the overall design while meeting both safety standards simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Pneumatic functions are extracted from the intrinsically-safe control module and placed in a separate explosion-proof I/O module. This extraction eliminates the risk of pressurized air ingress into the intrinsically-safe module, enhancing safety while the modular structure manages the increased complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10670054B2Constructing valve positioners for hazardous areas
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 DRESSER LLC
  • US10670054B2 patent drawing
  • US10670054B2 patent drawing
  • US10670054B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for a valve assembly that is configured to meet requirements for use in hazardous areas. These configurations may regulate flow of instrument air to a pneumatic actuator to operate a valve. The controller may comprise enclosures, including a first enclosure and a second enclosure, each having a peripheral wall forming an interior space, and circuitry comprising a barrier circuit disposed in the interior space of one of the enclosures that power limits digital signals that exits that enclosure. In one example, the peripheral wall of enclosures are configured to allow instrument air into the interior space of the first enclosure but to prevent instrument air from the interior space of the second enclosure.