Modular Reactive Power Compensators With Multi-Winding Transformer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems of modular reactive power compensators in wind farms face issues with circulating currents and oscillatory reactive power due to lack of communication and coordination among multiple VAR boxes, leading to increased complexity and expense for operators.

Innovation Solution

Integration of multiple modular VAR compensators through a multi-winding transformer, where each compensator couples to the point of common coupling (POCC) through its own secondary winding, leveraging the leakage inductance to create a high-impedance path for high-frequency circulating currents and isolate control loops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If multiple modular VAR compensators are connected without coordination, then reactive power compensation capacity is increased, but circulating currents and oscillatory reactive power occur due to lack of communication among VAR boxes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactive power compensation capacityVSAvoidcirculating currents and oscillatory reactive power
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A master VAR box is introduced as an intermediary that coordinates control signals among all modular VAR compensators. The master VAR box receives reference reactive power signals and distributes coordinated control commands to slave VAR boxes, eliminating circulating currents and oscillations while maintaining increased compensation capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The VAR compensator system is segmented into modular units with hierarchical control structure. Each modular VAR box operates as an independent unit but is coordinated through the master controller, allowing scalable capacity expansion without the harmful effects of uncoordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-generated harmful factors

If communication systems are added among VAR boxes to enable coordination, then circulating currents are reduced, but system complexity and expense increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecirculating currentsVSAvoidcommunication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of implementing full mesh communication among all VAR boxes, a single master VAR box acts as an intermediary controller. This centralized coordination approach eliminates the need for complex peer-to-peer communication infrastructure while effectively reducing circulating currents through coordinated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Control functions of multiple VAR boxes are merged under a single master controller. The master VAR box consolidates the coordination task, reducing the overall communication infrastructure complexity compared to distributed peer-to-peer communication systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If a single large VAR compensator is used at POCC, then grid code compliance is achieved, but flexibility and modularity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid code complianceVSAvoidsystem modularity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The VAR compensation system is divided into multiple modular VAR boxes that can be independently controlled and configured. These modular units collectively achieve grid code compliance at the POCC while maintaining flexibility for future expansion and adaptability to different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each modular VAR box is designed with universal functionality to perform reactive power compensation. The standardized modular design allows flexible configuration to meet various grid code requirements while maintaining adaptability for different wind farm sizes and configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces circulating currents and reactive power oscillations, simplifies system complexity, and eliminates the need for additional communication among VAR boxes, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

leveraging the leakage inductance to create a high-impedance path for high-frequency circulating currents and isolate control loops

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLeakage inductance: Inductor

Data Source

PatentUS11152787B2System of modular reactive power compensators
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US11152787B2 patent drawing
  • US11152787B2 patent drawing
  • US11152787B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system of reactive power compensators for a wind farm includes a multi-winding transformer and a plurality of modular reactive power compensators (MVBs). The multi-winding transformer includes a primary winding and a plurality of secondary windings. The primary winding is configured to be coupled to a point of common coupling (POCC) for the wind farm. The plurality of MVBs are each coupled to a corresponding winding of the plurality of secondary windings.