Modular Vehicle Assembly Control With Autonomous Module Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle assembly methods are cumbersome and time-consuming, limiting flexibility and increasing costs due to the need for multiple vehicles for different purposes, as they require manual disassembly and reassembly of modular vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for controlling the assembly of vehicles from a set of modules, where a drive module with autonomous operation connects to a functional module via interfaces, allowing for automated assembly and verification of connections, reducing manual labor and increasing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual disassembly and reassembly of modular vehicles is performed, then vehicle flexibility and customization are improved, but assembly time and labor complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle flexibilityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service assembly where the modular vehicle components automatically connect and verify their own integration. The control device coordinates autonomous modules to self-assemble into a functional vehicle without requiring manual disassembly and reassembly operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control device pre-coordinates the assembly process by receiving verification data from modules before final integration. Modules prepare their connection interfaces and verification systems in advance, enabling rapid assembly when the vehicle configuration is determined

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual disassembly and reassembly of modular vehicles is performed, then vehicle flexibility and customization are improved, but operational efficiency decreases due to vehicle-off-road time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle flexibilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous assembly system eliminates the need for manual intervention, allowing vehicles to be reconfigured rapidly between missions. Modules autonomously connect and verify integration, minimizing vehicle-off-road time and maximizing operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables dynamic reconfiguration of vehicle modules based on mission requirements. The control device can rapidly assemble different vehicle configurations from the same set of modules, allowing flexible adaptation without significant downtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple vehicles are maintained for different purposes, then service reliability is improved, but cost and resource utilization increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of vehicles
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements multi-functionality by enabling a single set of modular vehicles to perform multiple different purposes through reconfiguration. The control device assembles modules into different vehicle types (e.g., ambulance, cargo vehicle, passenger transport) from the same component set, eliminating the need to maintain separate vehicles for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The modular vehicle system dynamically adapts its configuration based on service requirements. The control device receives mission data and assembles appropriate vehicle configurations from available modules, allowing the same physical resources to serve multiple functions reliably

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If automated assembly with verification is implemented, then assembly speed and efficiency are improved, but system complexity and control requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where modules transmit verification data to the control device confirming successful integration. This automated feedback loop enables rapid assembly validation without requiring complex manual verification procedures, balancing speed with reliable quality control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3762256B1A method for controlling assembly of a vehicle from a set of modules, a control device, a system, a vehicle, a computer program and a computer-readable medium
Publication Date: 2023.11.29 SCANIA CV AB
  • EP3762256B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3762256B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP3762256B1 patent drawingFigure 5a~5b

AI summary

The invention relates to a method performed by a first control device (100) for controlling assembly of a vehicle (1) from a set of modules (20), the set of modules (20) comprising: at least one drive module (30); and at least one functional module (40), wherein the at least one drive module (30) comprises a pair of wheels (32) and is configured to be autonomously operated, and wherein each module (30; 40) in the set of modules (20) comprises at least one interface (50) releasably connectable to a corresponding interface (50) on another module, the method comprising: commanding (s101) a second control device (200) of the at least one drive module (30) to physically connect the at least one drive module (30) with the at least one functional module (40) to assemble a vehicle (1); and receiving (s102), from at least one of the modules (30; 40) of the assembled vehicle (1), a verification of the connection between the modules (30; 40).