Modular Vehicle Storage Layout for Passenger-Cargo Reconfiguration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle storage systems lack flexibility and efficient use of space, particularly in transitioning between passenger and cargo transport modes, with limited options for customizable storage configurations that accommodate various item sizes and types.

Innovation Solution

A modular vehicle storage system comprising a base with extendable partitions and cross members, coupled with drawers and sliders, that can be easily installed and removed to create multiple storage configurations within the vehicle, including separate compartments and unified spaces, to optimize storage and access during different transport modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a fixed storage structure is used in the vehicle, then structural stability is improved, but adaptability to different transport modes (passenger vs cargo) deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to transport modes

Core Design Contradiction:

Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The storage system is divided into modular components including a base unit,可扩展 partitions, and removable drawers that can be independently configured. This segmentation allows the storage system to be reconfigured for different transport modes while maintaining structural stability through standardized connection interfaces.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The storage system incorporates movable and adjustable elements such as sliding drawers, retractable partitions, and reconfigurable cross members that can dynamically adapt between passenger and cargo configurations. These dynamic components enable the system to transition between different functional states while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If a simple base structure is used, then ease of installation is improved, but storage capacity and organization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveease of installationVSAvoidstorage capacity

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base structure serves multiple functions: it provides the foundational support for the entire storage system, offers direct storage capacity itself, and serves as the mounting structure for additional components like partitions and drawers. This multi-functionality increases storage capacity without requiring separate complex structures.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If fixed partitions are used to create compartments, then organization of items is improved, but flexibility in space configuration deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveorganization of itemsVSAvoidflexibility in space configuration

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The partition system incorporates movable elements including sliding panels, retractable dividers, and adjustable cross members that can be repositioned to create different compartment configurations. These dynamic partitions maintain item organization through defined compartments while enabling flexible reconfiguration between passenger and cargo modes.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The partition system is divided into independent modular sections that can be individually adjusted or removed. This segmentation allows specific compartments to be reconfigured or eliminated based on transport needs while other sections maintain their organizational function.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If a complex modular system with multiple components is used, then adaptability and storage capacity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecustomizable storage configurationsVSAvoidnumber of components

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each component in the modular system is designed to perform multiple functions. For example, the base provides structural support, direct storage, and mounting surfaces. Partitions serve as both dividers and mounting surfaces for accessories. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed while maintaining high adaptability and storage capacity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple functions into unified components. The cross members serve both as structural support elements and as mounting surfaces for partitions and drawers. The base integrates structural support, storage surface, and attachment points for multiple components, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12179707B2Vehicle storage system

Publication Date: 2024.12.31 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC

AI summary

A vehicle storage system includes a base that is configured to be disposed on seating assemblies within a rear seating space. A first partition is coupled to the base, and the first partition extends along a first edge of the base. A second partition is spaced from the first partition. The second partition is coupled to the base and extends along a second opposing edge of the base. A cross member is coupled to a top edge of each of the first partition and the second partition. The cross member extends adjacent to a headliner.