Modular Mechanical Ventilator With Solenoid Gas Mixing and PEEP

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for low-cost, easily accessible, and easily usable mechanical ventilators that can be assembled from locally sourced components, particularly in response to the shortage of ventilators during emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and to address disparities in healthcare access in developing nations.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical ventilator design utilizing a solenoid and mixing valve to provide a patient's oxygen-air mixture, with a fluid flow controller and a continuous positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) system, allowing for multiple operating modes and assembly from common components like a bag-valve-mask (BVM) and solenoids, with a controller for easy operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If advanced ventilators are used to ensure reliable patient care, then the reliability of ventilation is improved, but the cost and complexity of the device increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventilation reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilator is divided into separate functional modules: a microcontroller unit for control, a solenoid valve for gas flow regulation, a mixing chamber for oxygen-air blending, and a bag-valve-mask assembly for delivery. This modular segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability, and enables local assembly from available parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device incorporates multiple operating modes (volume-controlled ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation, and high-flow oxygen therapy) within a single unified platform. The same hardware architecture supports different ventilation strategies, making the device versatile and adaptable to various clinical scenarios without requiring multiple specialized machines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If high-end ventilators are deployed to meet emergency demand, then the quality of care is improved, but the cost and accessibility worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecare qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilator design intentionally uses inexpensive, readily available components that can be easily manufactured or sourced locally. The bag-valve-mask assembly, solenoid valves, and basic control electronics are chosen for their low cost and widespread availability, enabling mass production and local assembly rather than relying on expensive imported equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The device is designed to be assembled, operated, and maintained with minimal specialized training. The modular architecture allows local technicians to assemble the ventilator from separate components, and the simple control interface enables operators to quickly learn effective use without extensive education programs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If specialized ventilators are imported to meet demand, then the ventilation capability is improved, but the ease of local assembly and maintenance worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventilation capabilityVSAvoidlocal assembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilator is divided into separate functional modules: a microcontroller unit for control, a solenoid valve for gas flow regulation, a mixing chamber for oxygen-air blending, and a bag-valve-mask assembly for delivery. This modular segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability, and enables local assembly from available parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If complex ventilator systems are deployed to ensure adequate oxygen delivery, then the tidal volume delivery is improved, but the ease of use and training requirement worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxygen deliveryVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates multiple operating modes (volume-controlled ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation, and high-flow oxygen therapy) within a single unified platform. The same hardware architecture supports different ventilation strategies, making the device versatile and adaptable to various clinical scenarios without requiring multiple specialized machines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ventilator provides effective oxygen therapy, reduces CO2 buildup, and increases tidal volume, offering a cost-effective solution that can be assembled and maintained locally, suitable for various environments including hospitals, submarines, and battlefields, and can rival high-end ventilators at a fraction of the cost.

Implementation Method 1

Example ventilators can use a solenoid and mixing valve to provide a patient's oxygen-air mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid: Solenoid

Implementation Method 2

The fluid flow controller has a fluid flow controller output line operably connected to a patient line, and is controlled by a pneumatic actuator driven by an on-off valve to deliver the mixed gas to a patient line at appropriate intervals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow control:

Implementation Method 3

A second line is disposed to receive the mixed gas, the second line being configured to create a continuous, constantly flowing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPositive end-expiratory pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS12589215B2Mechanical respirator
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY (SDSU) FOUNDATION
  • US12589215B2 patent drawing
  • US12589215B2 patent drawing
  • US12589215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In alternative embodiments, provided are mechanical ventilators and methods for making and using them.