Modular wall installation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional modular wall installations often create a perception of confinement in interior spaces due to their orthogonal orientation relative to floors and ceilings, limiting the perceived size of individual spaces.

Innovation Solution

The use of angled panels oriented at non-orthogonal angles relative to the floor and ceiling, combined with modular wall modules that can be easily reconfigured, creates a volume differential that enhances the perception of openness and larger space dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If orthogonal wall panels are used to define individual spaces, then structural stability and ease of construction are improved, but the perceived space size deteriorates creating a confinement effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidperceived space size
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using wall panels with non-orthogonal orientations, specifically at angles between 60-120 degrees relative to each other. This asymmetric configuration disrupts the traditional box-like appearance of orthogonal walls, creating a more dynamic visual effect that makes spaces appear larger and less confining while maintaining structural integrity through the engineered angular relationships between panels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dimensional change by transitioning from standard orthogonal (90-degree) wall configurations to non-orthogonal angular configurations. This changes the geometric dimensionality of the space definition, creating volume differentials and visual depth that enhance perceived space size without compromising the structural stability provided by the rigid panel connections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If fixed modular wall modules are used, then ease of installation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates limiting reconfiguration options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidreconfiguration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by designing modular wall modules with movable and adjustable components. The modules incorporate mechanisms that allow them to be repositioned, reoriented, and reconfigured from fixed positions to different spatial arrangements. This dynamic capability enables the same modular components to adapt to various layout requirements while maintaining ease of installation through standardized connection interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If traditional perpendicular wall orientation is used, then construction simplicity is improved, but space perception deteriorates creating a confining environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction simplicityVSAvoidspace perception
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by deliberately deviating from the symmetric orthogonal arrangement of traditional walls. By configuring wall panels at varied non-90-degree angles, the design creates visual interest and perceived spatial expansion while the modular nature of the panels maintains construction simplicity through standardized manufacturing and assembly procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP3008257B1Modular wall installation
Publication Date: 2021.08.04 DIRTT ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
  • EP3008257B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3008257B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3008257B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Implementations of the present invention relate to systems, methods, and apparatus for forming individual spaces within a building. More specifically, implementations can involve partitions and/or walls that can define an individual space, which can produce a perception for occupants that the individual space is larger than actual dimensions thereof. As such, the occupants of the individual space can have a perception or experience of being in an individual space that is non-confining or less confining than a conventional individual space.