Modular Structural Wall Panels for Light-Frame Construction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current light-frame construction practices are inefficient due to the need for on-site skilled labor, high material waste, and sequential building processes, which increase construction costs and waste generation.

Innovation Solution

Structural wall panels that combine framing, insulation, utilities, and sheet materials, allowing for rapid assembly of complete wall systems, reducing on-site labor and waste, and enabling easy disassembly and reuse in different building configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional light-frame construction is used with sequential building processes, then construction flexibility is maintained, but construction time and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction speedVSAvoidpanel structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wall assembly is segmented into pre-fabricated panels that combine framing members, sheet materials, insulation, and utilities into modular units. Each panel is constructed as a complete assembly rather than individual components, enabling rapid installation while maintaining construction flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Panels are pre-assembled with framing, sheet materials, insulation, and utilities integrated before reaching the construction site. This preliminary fabrication of complete wall assemblies eliminates on-site sequencing of multiple trades and significantly reduces construction time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of substance

If traditional on-site framing and sheeting installation is used, then adaptability to site conditions is maintained, but material waste increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial wasteVSAvoidpanel fabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The wall system is divided into discrete panels that can be manufactured with precise material quantities. This segmentation allows for optimized material cutting and assembly in the controlled factory environment, minimizing trimmings and offcuts compared to on-site framing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panel design enables recovery and reuse of framing members, sheet materials, and other components. Panels can be disassembled and materials recovered for use in subsequent construction projects, reducing overall material consumption and waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Loss of time

If multiple trades perform sequential work on-site, then construction quality can be maintained, but labor costs and construction time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction timelineVSAvoidintegrated panel system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple construction functions (framing, sheathing, insulation installation, utility routing) are merged into a single integrated panel assembly. This consolidation eliminates the need for sequential work by multiple trades on-site, dramatically reducing construction timeline while maintaining quality through factory-controlled assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

All construction activities that would normally occur sequentially on-site are performed in advance during panel fabrication. Framing members are assembled, sheet materials are attached, insulation is installed, and utilities are routed before the panel leaves the factory, eliminating on-site sequencing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If traditional construction waste is combined and landfilled, then disposal is simplified, but environmental impact and recycling opportunities are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel reuse capabilityVSAvoiddisassembly and recovery system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wall system is segmented into discrete panels that can be independently removed and reused. This segmentation enables selective recovery of framing members, sheet materials, and other components for use in subsequent projects, rather than combined landfilling of all construction waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panel design incorporates features that facilitate disassembly and material recovery. Framing members are designed for easy removal, and connections are made to allow panel detachment without damage, enabling recovery and reuse of valuable materials in different construction applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS9765510B2Structural wall panels for use in light-frame construction and methods of construction employing structural wall panels
Publication Date: 2017.09.19 CONVERGENT MARKET RESEACH INC
  • US9765510B2 patent drawing
  • US9765510B2 patent drawing
  • US9765510B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structural wall panel includes an elongated shared structural framing member and one or more elongated intermediate structural framing members. An elongated top track is connected to a top end of each of the framing members. An inner sheet of suitable sheet material may be secured to the framing members so as to form an inner face of the structural wall panel, while an outer sheet of suitable sheet material may be secured to the framing members so as to form an outer face of the structural wall panel opposite the inner face. The elongated top track and inner and outer sheets are aligned on the framing members so as to form a male receiver at one lateral side of the panel and a female receiving structure along the opposite lateral side of the panel.