Modular Warehouse Movement System for Flexible Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional automatic warehouses face difficulties in adapting to changes in the number, size, and type of modules, requiring redesign and re-sizing of the entire structure to accommodate different movement systems, which is costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A modular movement system that allows for the integration of standardized components, enabling the expansion of the system without redesigning, and allows drawers to be exchanged laterally, enabling flexible arrangement and operation independence of each module, with internal transport systems working in parallel to enhance efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If traditional automatic warehouses use dedicated design and construction methods, then structural stability is improved, but adaptability to variations in module number and type deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to module variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The warehouse structure is divided into independent standardized modules that can be individually added, removed, or reconfigured. Each module contains complete functional elements (shelves, drawers, movement systems) that operate independently, allowing the overall system to adapt to varying storage requirements without compromising structural integrity of individual modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universal standardized interfaces and components that can serve multiple functions across different module configurations. The movement system, drawer dimensions, and connection mechanisms are designed to be compatible across all modules, enabling a single module design to fulfill various storage needs while maintaining structural stability through consistent standardized construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional warehouses require redesign for different movement systems, then movement system suitability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement system compatibilityVSAvoidredesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The movement system is designed with universal standardized components and interfaces that can accommodate different drawer types and configurations without requiring complete redesign. The system uses standardized rails, motors, and control protocols that work across all modules, allowing flexibility in movement system configuration while maintaining manageable complexity through repetition of proven designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual movement and fork lift trucks are used, then flexibility in movement is improved, but productivity and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement flexibilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The warehouse system incorporates automated movement mechanisms within each module that enable drawers to be automatically transported to and from storage positions without manual intervention. The system self-manages the movement of stored items through integrated motors and control systems, eliminating the need for external fork lift trucks and manual handling while maintaining flexible positioning capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Area of stationary object

If modules are interconnected without independence, then space utilization is improved, but operational independence and maintenance flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidoperational independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The warehouse employs modular sections that are physically connected for space optimization but operationally independent through standardized disconnect interfaces. Each module can be independently accessed, maintained, or removed without affecting the functionality of other modules, while still allowing efficient space utilization when modules are assembled together in standardized configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3577040B1Modular automatic warehouse for storing industrial products
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 AMBROSI SRL
  • EP3577040B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3577040B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3577040B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

A modular automatic warehouse comprising at least one module (30) having a parallelepiped shape delimited by respective vertical uprights, said module (30) comprising a first and a second element (70, 80) consisting each of a plurality of substantially horizontal seats or guides defined by structural flanks (31) for the introduction and/ or extraction of a respective plurality of shelves or drawers (32) adapted to contain said articles to be stored, said first (70) and second (80) elements being opposite to each other and separated by a compartment (90) inside which at least one lift (33) operates, the lift (33) able to translate from a lowered position to a raised position in order to move to a location of said drawers, wherein said warehouse further comprises a means (36) for translating at least one at a time of said drawers (32) towards further similar adjacent modules in turn provided with a means for translating the drawers to be displaced, and wherein said means acts inside said compartment (90) which is open at least in the translation direction from one module to the other.