Modular Warehouse Vehicles With Lift Modules for Scalable Inventory Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern material handling systems in warehouses face challenges in efficiently managing inventory as they grow in scale and complexity, leading to increased costs and complexity, with existing automation solutions becoming cost-prohibitive and inefficient as they reach a point of diminishing returns.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of modular, automated guided vehicles that can interact with functional accessory modules (FAMs) to perform various inventory management tasks, allowing for vertical and horizontal displacement, enabling the system to adapt to increasing complexity and demands by adding or substituting new FAMs, thus maintaining efficiency and throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing automation infrastructure is incrementally expanded to accommodate greater inventory scale, then capacity and functionality are improved, but cost and complexity increase to the point of diminishing returns

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the automation infrastructure into independent autonomous vehicles and interchangeable functional modules. Each vehicle is a self-contained unit that can independently perform tasks, and modules can be swapped based on needs. This segmentation allows the system to scale capacity by adding individual units rather than expanding complex integrated systems, thereby improving productivity while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicles are designed with universal interfaces that allow them to work with multiple types of functional modules. A single vehicle platform can perform different inventory management tasks by simply changing the attached module, providing multi-functionality without requiring multiple specialized systems. This universality improves capacity utilization while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If existing automation infrastructure is expanded to meet growing throughput requirements, then productivity is improved, but cost becomes prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the throughput enhancement into discrete, additive units. Instead of costly comprehensive system upgrades, throughput is increased by adding individual autonomous vehicles or functional modules as needed. This modular segmentation allows for incremental investment that matches actual throughput requirements, making capacity expansion cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its capacity by adding or removing vehicles and modules based on real-time throughput requirements. This dynamic scalability allows the system to pay only for the capacity actually needed at any given time, rather than over-provisioning for peak demand, thereby reducing overall costs while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If new inventory management tasks are added to accommodate increasing complexity, then functionality is improved, but system complexity becomes unmanageable

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different inventory management tasks are segmented into separate interchangeable functional modules. Each module encapsulates a specific function (e.g., picking, packing, sorting), allowing new tasks to be added by attaching dedicated modules rather than integrating complex multi-functional additions. This keeps the overall system architecture simple while providing extensive functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicle acts as an intermediary platform between the fixed infrastructure and the various functional tasks. By standardizing the vehicle interface and allowing different modules to attach to the same vehicle type, the system adds functionality through module substitution rather than system redesign, maintaining manageability while expanding capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If pre-existing material handling infrastructure is replaced with new automation platform, then capacity and functionality are reset, but cost is prohibitive and disruption occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The new autonomous vehicle platform is designed with universal interfaces that can work with existing infrastructure and storage systems. This universality allows the system to leverage existing investments while adding modern automation capabilities, avoiding the need for complete infrastructure replacement and reducing costs and disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows for gradual transition and hybrid operation where autonomous vehicles can work alongside existing material handling equipment. This dynamic approach enables phased implementation rather than complete replacement, spreading costs over time and maintaining operational capacity during the transition period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This modular approach allows for scalable and efficient inventory management, addressing growing inventory differentiation, increasing order picking volumes, and higher throughput requirements without the need for complete infrastructure replacement, by enabling vehicles to perform multiple tasks through interchangeable modules.

Implementation Method 1

the controller is configured to control rotation of drive elements of the second drive system to align drive elements of the first drive system with a guide system and to control rotation of the drive elements of the first drive system to displace the vehicle vertically, relative to an underlying support surface, to reach a storage location

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical rotation and vertical displacement: Gear

Implementation Method 2

the controller is configured to control rotation of the drive elements of the second drive system to cause the vehicle to enter an accessory module and to displace the accessory module horizontally and to control rotation of the first plurality of drive elements of the first drive system to displace the accessory module vertically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical rotation and horizontal/vertical displacement: Gear

Data Source

PatentUS12129121B2Systems and methods for managing inventory
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 OPEX CORP
  • US12129121B2 patent drawing
  • US12129121B2 patent drawing
  • US12129121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle configured to perform inventory management tasks comprises first and second drive systems respectively actuated by a controller. In a first mode of operation, the first drive system is operable to drive the vehicle along a horizontal surface. In a second mode of operation, the second drive system is operable to drive the vehicle vertically. In a third mode of operation, the second drive system is operable to lift a module vertically to lift the module off the horizontal surface so that actuating the first drive system drives the vehicle and the module along the horizontal surface.