Modular Water Barrier Panels for Flood Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional flood control barriers are often expensive, difficult to install, and not adequately effective, as they require significant labor and resources, and are typically not reusable, posing challenges in managing flood waters efficiently and safely.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, versatile, and cost-effective water management barrier system that can be easily assembled and disassembled by one or two people, made from materials like low-density polyethylene, which can be filled with pourable materials to increase weight and stability, and features a modular design for adaptability to various terrains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sandbags are used to control flood waters, then flood control is achieved, but the cost and time required for filling and transporting sandbags becomes prohibitively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflood control effectivenessVSAvoidtime to fill and place sandbags
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The flood barrier is divided into multiple interconnected panels that can be independently handled and assembled. Each panel is a manageable unit that can be quickly deployed without requiring the extensive preparation needed for traditional sandbag systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier panels are pre-fabricated with integrated connection mechanisms and filling structures. The hollow interiors are designed to be easily filled with water or other materials through pre-positioned openings, eliminating the need for time-consuming on-site construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If sandbags are used to control flood waters, then flood control is achieved, but the true cost including labor, sand, and cleanup becomes significantly high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflood control effectivenessVSAvoidcost of sandbag system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier panels are designed as reusable components that can be deployed and removed multiple times. The panels themselves are made from cost-effective materials, and their modular design allows for easy replacement or reuse, significantly reducing the overall cost compared to disposable sandbag systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier panels can be used for multiple purposes beyond flood control, including as temporary walls, dividers, or containment structures. This multi-functionality increases the value-to-cost ratio by allowing the same infrastructure to serve various needs across different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traffic barriers are used as flood control barriers, then some flood control is achieved, but the barriers are heavy and increase transport and assembly cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflood control capabilityVSAvoidweight of barrier
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier panels utilize water filling in their hollow interiors as a counterweight mechanism. When deployed, the panels are filled with water to provide the necessary weight for stability and flood resistance, but remain lightweight during transport when empty, significantly reducing transportation costs and effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier system transitions from a static heavy structure to a dynamic system where the weight can be adjusted by controlling the water content. This allows the barrier to be lightweight during transport and maximally weighted during deployment, optimizing both mobility and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If traditional flood control barriers are used, then flood control is achieved, but they are difficult to install and remove

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflood control effectivenessVSAvoidease of installation and removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is segmented into modular panels with standardized connection interfaces. These panels can be easily assembled and disassembled by connecting and disconnecting the interfaces, requiring minimal labor and no specialized equipment for installation or removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection mechanisms between panels include intermediary elements such as interlocking features, clips, or coupling devices that simplify the joining process. These intermediaries allow panels to be quickly connected and disconnected without requiring complex procedures or specialized tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9004815B2Water containment barriers, systems, and methods of using the same
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 TAYLOR JAREN
  • US9004815B2 patent drawing
  • US9004815B2 patent drawing
  • US9004815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a water containment barrier may include a hollow body at least partially defined by a front wall, a back wall, a top portion, a bottom portion, a first end, and a second end. An external support system may be connected to the front wall of the hollow body. The external support system may include an upper cross member, a lower cross member, a first side member generally extending between the upper and lower cross members, and a second side member generally opposite the first side member. The external support system may be configured to at least partially reinforce the front wall against internal forces and/or external forces exerted on the front wall. The barrier may also include an elongated foot member attached to the bottom portion.