Modular Wave-Break System with Dissipating Holes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for mitigating wave energy near shorelines are either costly, inflexible, or ineffective in conforming to the natural contours of the shoreline, failing to dissipate low-energy waves and prevent erosion effectively.

Innovation Solution

A modular wave-break system comprising a tapered base and interconnected modules with dissipating holes and passage holes, allowing for custom deployment and effective energy dissipation, while allowing sea creatures to pass through, and being anchored to the water bottom for stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional seawalls are used to protect shoreline, then erosion protection is provided, but installation cost increases and fish passage is blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshoreline erosionVSAvoidinstallation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The seawall is divided into modular segments that can be independently manufactured and assembled. Each module contains fish passage openings, allowing the structure to protect shorelines while maintaining ecological connectivity. The modular design reduces installation complexity and cost compared to traditional continuous seawalls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If breakwater modules are assembled in straight line, then wave energy dissipation is achieved, but inability to conform to shoreline contours reduces effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewave energy dissipationVSAvoidshoreline contour conformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The breakwater is constructed from discrete modular units that can be arranged in various configurations. These modules can be assembled to follow the natural contours of any shoreline, providing effective wave energy dissipation while adapting to complex coastal geometries that straight-line structures cannot accommodate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If modular wave-break is deployed in custom arrangement, then shoreline contour matching is improved, but deployment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshoreline contour matchingVSAvoiddeployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses standardized modular units with simple connection mechanisms that can be rapidly assembled in custom configurations. The modularity allows complex shoreline contours to be matched through straightforward module arrangement rather than custom fabrication, reducing overall deployment complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Force

If wave energy is not dissipated, then wave force reaches shoreline, but shoreline damage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewave forceVSAvoidshoreline damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The modular breakwater structure converts the harmful kinetic energy of incoming waves into beneficial turbulent flow patterns that dissipate energy before reaching the shoreline. The module design promotes wave breaking and energy dissipation while maintaining aesthetic and ecological benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular wave-break system effectively dissipates wave energy, prevents shoreline erosion, and can be custom-deployed to match shoreline contours, providing a cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution for wave management.

Implementation Method 1

After a wave breaks, the wave amplitude lessens as the energy is dissipated into eddy currents and turbulent flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

The energy of the wave is lost through contact with the water bottom

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy dissipation:

Implementation Method 3

an anchor attached to the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical attachment: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS10400407B2Modular wave-break and bulkhead system
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 CHD DEVELOPMENT LLC
  • US10400407B2 patent drawing
  • US10400407B2 patent drawing
  • US10400407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular wave-break includes a wall, a base attached to the wall, and an anchor attached to the base. The wall includes a set of dissipating holes integrally formed in the wall and a set of passage holes integrally formed in the wall. Reinforcing structural rods may be embedded in the wall, the base, and the anchor to provide strength. Mounting holes in the base enable the modular wave-break to be secured to a water bottom surface. Multiple modular wave-breaks may be interconnected to form a single wave-break. In an alternate embodiment, a water control structure provides for management of the water table of a wetland area. The water control structure includes a panel comprising a wall, a base attached to the wall, an anchor attached to the base, and a flow hole through the wall. Multiple panels are connected in series to create a water tight water control structure.