Modular Wellbore Fracture Flow Model for Pressure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for modeling fluid flow in hydraulic fracturing face challenges in accurately calculating fracturing pressure due to complexities such as wellbore casing roughness and perforation friction drop, necessitating improved techniques for predicting fluid pressure in fractures.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of separate components like wellbore, perforation, and fracture components, modeled using computers to simulate fluid flow, allowing for dynamic changes in these components based on stages of the drilling and completions procedure, to accurately determine fluid flow aspects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If separate components (wellbore, perforation, fracture) are used to model fluid flow, then measurement precision of fluid pressure is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid pressure prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodeling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fluid flow modeling system is divided into separate independent components: a wellbore component for modeling wellbore sections, a perforation component for modeling perforation sections, and a fracture component for modeling fracture sections. Each component can be selected and applied independently to different sections of the subsurface, allowing for precise modeling of fluid flow characteristics in each specific zone while maintaining modular system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic changes to model components are made during different stages, then adaptability to process changes is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling adaptability to stage transitionsVSAvoiddynamic model management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The modeling system is designed to dynamically transition between different stages of drilling and completions procedures. The computer can select and switch between different wellbore components, perforation components, and fracture components based on the current operational stage, allowing the model to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining a structured approach to managing complexity through stage-based component selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11675941B2Modeling fluid flow in a wellbore for hydraulic fracturing pressure determination
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO
  • US11675941B2 patent drawing
  • US11675941B2 patent drawing
  • US11675941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for modeling fluid flow in a wellbore is provided. Hydraulic fracturing is an effective technique to improve well productivity by forming high permeable pathways for hydrocarbons to flow from the rock formation to the wellbore. Fluid flow for hydraulic fracturing is modeled using separated flow components, including a wellbore component (modeling the wellbore(s)), a perforation component (modeling the perforations(s)), a fracture component (modeling the fracture(s)) and a rock component (modeling the rock). Each respective component may be selected independently from a plurality of available components. Further, the respective components may be coupled to one another only at their interfaces, such as at a wellbore-perforation interface, a perforation-fracture interface, and a fracture-rock interface, for continuity of fluid kinematics and properties (such as pressure and density). In this way, the modeling of the subsurface may be tailored to the respective components in order to effectively predict the fracturing treatment.