Modular Wind Turbine Blade Spar With Overlapping Shear Webs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current manufacturing methods for wind turbine blades are labor and capital intensive, leading to high costs and increased probability of defects, especially with larger blades, which are difficult to transport and require over-engineering, resulting in higher material and installation costs. Additionally, existing modular designs face issues with structural integrity and aerodynamic performance at connections.

Innovation Solution

A modular wind turbine blade design featuring a spar composed of multiple beams arranged side by side, with longitudinal webs and flanges, allowing for standardized, cost-effective production and assembly. The beams can be of different types, such as closed or open sections, and are connected via mechanical fixings or adhesives, with overlapping shear webs to transmit loads in shear, reducing material usage and maintaining structural integrity while allowing for tapered and curved configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If blades are made larger to capture more wind energy, then power generation capability is improved, but transportation difficulty and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generation capabilityVSAvoidtransportation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is divided into multiple modular sections (root section, intermediate sections, tip section) that can be manufactured separately and transported independently. Each section contains a complete spar structure with beams, webs, and flanges, allowing the blade to be assembled on-site without requiring transportation of the entire blade structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Power

If blades are made larger to capture more wind energy, then fewer turbines are needed for the same power generation, but manufacturing cost and defect probability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generation capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and quality
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is segmented into multiple sections that can be manufactured using standardized processes and then assembled. This allows for better quality control in each section and reduces the complexity of manufacturing a single large blade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different beam configurations (closed box sections vs. open I-sections) are used in different sections of the blade based on local structural requirements. The spar cap depth and beam arrangement are optimized for each specific section's load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If traditional modular designs are used with box section reinforcements, then transportation is facilitated, but structural complexity and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation easeVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is divided into transportable sections while using efficient open-section beam structures rather than heavy box sections throughout. The segmentation allows for simplified beam designs in each section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Closed box section beams are used only where structurally necessary (such as in the root section or high-load areas), while open I-section beams are used in other sections to reduce material usage and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If blade sections are connected with traditional joining methods, then structural integrity may be compromised, but aerodynamic performance at connections deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidaerodynamic shape
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The spar structure is designed with overlapping webs and pre-positioned bearing blocks that facilitate smooth load transfer between sections. The bearing blocks are precisely positioned to maintain the aerodynamic profile while enabling mechanical connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Bearing blocks serve as intermediary elements between adjacent blade sections, providing a smooth transition for load transfer while maintaining the aerodynamic contour. These blocks are integrated with the spar cap structure to minimize disruption to the aerodynamic shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces material wastage, transportation costs, and maintains structural integrity and aerodynamic performance by transmitting loads through overlapping shear webs, enabling the use of expensive materials only where necessary and allowing for flexible blade configurations without increasing weight or cost.

Implementation Method 1

Overlapping shear webs are provided to transmit loads in shear

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

The flanges and webs are preferably adhered together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS8696317B2Wind turbine blade
Publication Date: 2014.04.15 BLADE DYNAMICS LTD
  • US8696317B2 patent drawing
  • US8696317B2 patent drawing
  • US8696317B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spar (30) for a wind turbine blade. The spar comprises a plurality (typically three or more) beams (33) arranged side-by-side. Each beam has a longitudinal web (32), a flange (31) at either longitudinal edge. The spar may be made up of a number of modules connected to one another primarily via overlapping shear webs.