Modular Work Cell Matrix for Scalable Custom Construction Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturers face challenges in producing a wide variety of construction products that meet different codes, regulations, and customer expectations while maintaining the ability to produce at scale, often requiring manual processes and limited automation that hinder scalability.

Innovation Solution

A manufacturing matrix system with modular work cells, including robotic arms, digital support systems, and a data processing system that allows for real-time reprogramming and task adjustments to accommodate various projects, enabling flexible production of diverse construction products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual processes and limited automation are used to produce a wide variety of construction products, then adaptability to different codes and customer expectations is improved, but productivity and scalability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different codes and customer expectationsVSAvoidproductivity and scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm system is designed with a universal interface that can accommodate multiple tools and end-effectors, allowing a single robotic platform to perform diverse construction tasks including drilling, fastening, cutting, and material handling. This multi-functionality enables the system to adapt to different product types and customization requirements while maintaining automated high-speed production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing system incorporates programmable robotic arms with dynamic reconfiguration capabilities, allowing production parameters, tool selections, and assembly sequences to be changed through software programming rather than physical reconfiguration. This dynamic adaptability enables rapid response to different codes and customer specifications while sustaining automated productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If extensive automation is implemented to increase productivity, then productivity is improved, but device complexity and difficulty of operation are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm system incorporates self-positioning and self-alignment capabilities through sensors and control systems that automatically adjust tool positions and orientations. The system can autonomously navigate workspaces, locate components, and perform quality checks, reducing the need for complex manual intervention and simplifying operation while maintaining high automated productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional manufacturing approaches are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to varying regulations and customer preferences is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidadaptability to varying regulations and customer preferences
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates pre-programmed compliance libraries containing building codes, regulations, and customer preference parameters that are loaded before production begins. These preliminary configurations allow the robotic system to automatically adjust manufacturing parameters to meet specific regulatory requirements and customer specifications without requiring complex real-time decision-making, maintaining ease of manufacture while achieving high adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the production of customized construction products that conform to varying rules and expectations at scale, facilitating efficient and adaptable manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

The arm tool can include a suction device coupled with the main body. The suction device can temporarily couple the component with the arm tool via suction.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 2

The arm tool can include a magnet holder coupled with the main body. The magnet holder can selectively engage and disengage a magnetic assembly to couple the component with a work surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic assembly: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS20250353181A1Systems and methods of matrix manufacturing with work cells
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 REFRAME SYSTEMS INC
  • US20250353181A1 patent drawing
  • US20250353181A1 patent drawing
  • US20250353181A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A manufacturing matrix can include a plurality of work cells. The manufacturing matrix can include a plurality of robotic arms disposed in the plurality of work cells to produce a construction product. The manufacturing matrix can include a storage location to store inventory including at least one of the material, the tool, the subassembly of the construction product, or a completed construction product. The manufacturing matrix can include a transportation system to move the inventory within the manufacturing matrix. The manufacturing matrix can include a data processing system communicably coupled with the plurality of robotic arms and the transportation system. The data processing system can provide a first instruction to a first robotic arm cell and a second instruction to a second robotic arm of the second work cell.