Modular Zygomatic Implant Assembly for Severe Bone Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing zygomatic dental implants lack individualized solutions for patients with varying bone loss and maxillofacial structures, leading to potential complications and reduced mechanical stability, increased risk of infections, and exposure to the maxillary sinus.

Innovation Solution

A zygomatic dental implant set comprising an implant pin, an intermediate connecting member with a curved shape, a first extender, and a prosthetic abutment with a single-piece design, allowing customization and improved mechanical stability, reduced risk of complications, and minimized sinus exposure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional zygomatic implants are used, then the procedure is simple and costs are reduced, but the solution lacks individualization for patients with varying bone loss and maxillofacial structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividualization for patientsVSAvoidimplant set complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant set is divided into multiple modular components: implant pin, intermediate connecting member, extender, and prosthetic abutment. This segmentation allows each component to be selected and configured based on individual patient needs, achieving customization without requiring entirely different implant systems for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant set incorporates adjustable and configurable elements that allow the system to adapt to different clinical scenarios. The modular design enables dynamic reconfiguration of the implant assembly based on bone loss severity, maxillofacial structure variations, and specific patient requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If conventional implants are used, then surgical morbidity is low and procedure simplicity is maintained, but mechanical stability is reduced in severe bone loss cases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stabilityVSAvoidimplant structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant structure is segmented into distinct functional components that can be independently optimized for mechanical stability. The implant pin provides anchorage, the intermediate connecting member provides structural support, and the extender allows adjustment of the prosthetic abutment position, collectively enhancing mechanical stability in severe bone loss cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant set utilizes titanium or titanium alloy materials known for their high strength-to-weight ratio and biocompatibility. This material selection ensures adequate mechanical stability while maintaining procedural simplicity and low surgical morbidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If conventional implants are used, then the procedure can be performed in non-hospital environments, but the risk of infections and sinus exposure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk reduction of complicationsVSAvoidimplant set design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediate connecting member serves as a mediator between the implant pin and the prosthetic abutment, providing a controlled interface that reduces the risk of sinus exposure and infection. This intermediary component allows for precise positioning and sealing, enhancing reliability while maintaining the simplicity of non-hospital procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional implants are used, then costs are reduced and accessibility is improved, but individualized care for diverse bone loss scenarios is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization for bone loss scenariosVSAvoidimplant configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The modular segmented design allows each component to be selected based on the specific bone loss scenario, enabling individualized care while maintaining cost-effectiveness and accessibility through a standardized yet configurable implant system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12605233B2Zygomatic dental implant set
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 IMPLACIL DE BORTOLI MATERIAL ODONTOLOGICO SA
  • US12605233B2 patent drawing
  • US12605233B2 patent drawing
  • US12605233B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a dental implant set, more precisely to a zygomatic dental implant set for in-bone dental implant surgeries of the zygomatic arch via intraoral access. The zygomatic dental implant set (100) comprises an implant pin (10) configured to be anchored in the zygomatic bone; an intermediate connecting member (20) comprising a curved shape; wherein a first end (21) of the intermediate connecting member (20) is configured to be coupled directly or indirectly to the implant pin (10); a first extender (30), wherein the first extender (30) is coupled to a second end (22) of the intermediate connecting member (20); a prosthetic abutment (40), wherein a first end (41) of the prosthetic abutment (40) comprises an outer thread (42), wherein the outer thread (42) of the prosthetic abutment (40) is coupled to a first inner thread (23) of the intermediate connecting member (20); and wherein a second end (43) of the prosthetic abutment (40) is configured to receive a dental prosthesis.