Modulating Furnace Firing Control to Prevent Flame Extinction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Furnaces with modulating firing rates often experience flame extinction at lower firing rates due to safety features or blockages, leading to inefficient heating and potential occupant discomfort or pipe freezing, as they cycle between ignition and reduced firing rates without maintaining sufficient heat.

Innovation Solution

A furnace with a controller that sets the firing rate above the minimum after a call for heat, modulates downward, and if the flame is lost, resets to a higher firing rate for ignition and maintains that rate until the heat demand is met, ensuring continuous heating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the firing rate is reduced to improve fuel efficiency and occupant comfort, then energy consumption decreases, but the flame may be extinguished due to safety features or blockages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidflame stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by establishing a minimum firing rate threshold before allowing modulation downward. When the flame is detected to be lost, the system has already predetermined that the firing rate must be maintained above the extinction point, preventing the harmful effect of flame extinction while enabling energy-efficient operation at moderate loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback by continuously monitoring flame presence and using this information to adjust the firing rate modulation behavior. When flame loss is detected, the feedback loop triggers maintenance of a higher firing rate, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to actual combustion conditions and prevents repeated cycling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If the furnace cycles between ignition and reduced firing rates, then fuel efficiency improves, but occupant comfort deteriorates due to insufficient heating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidoccupant comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by enabling continuous modulation of the firing rate between minimum and maximum levels rather than operating in discrete on/off cycles. The controller dynamically adjusts the firing rate based on the call for heat intensity and flame stability, allowing smooth transitions that maintain occupant comfort while optimizing fuel efficiency across varying load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operating parameter of firing rate continuously rather than in discrete steps. By modifying the firing rate parameter dynamically and maintaining it above the extinction point when flame loss occurs, the system achieves efficient operation across a range of conditions without the discomfort of repeated cycling and insufficient heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the firing rate is modulated downward to meet varying heat demands, then adaptability improves, but the risk of flame extinction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiring rate modulationVSAvoidflame stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes predetermined minimum firing rate thresholds and modulation rules before operation begins. These preliminary settings create safety margins that prevent the firing rate from dropping to levels where flame extinction is likely, while still allowing sufficient downward modulation to meet varying heat demands adaptively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies beforehand cushioning by maintaining the firing rate above the extinction point as a protective buffer. This cushioning effect absorbs the variability and instability that would otherwise cause flame extinction during modulation, ensuring reliable operation while preserving adaptability to load changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Reliability

If safety features extinguish the flame at reduced firing rates, then safety reliability improves, but heating effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety controlVSAvoidheating effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from safety controllers and flame detection to inform firing rate modulation decisions. When safety features indicate potential flame instability, the feedback loop adjusts the firing rate downward more conservatively or maintains it above critical thresholds, reconciling safety requirements with heating effectiveness by avoiding unnecessary flame extinction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies the firing rate parameter based on safety controller inputs and flame detection feedback. By dynamically changing the firing rate parameter within safe operating boundaries, the system maintains heating effectiveness while respecting safety constraints, preventing the binary on/off behavior that would reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution prevents repeated cycling and maintains sufficient heat, enhancing occupant comfort and preventing freezing issues by maintaining a firing rate above the extinction point until the heat demand is satisfied.

Implementation Method 1

a furnace employs a burner that burns a fuel such as natural gas, propane, oil or the like, and provides heated combustion gases to the interior of a heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

a circulating air blower typically forces return air from the building, and in some cases ventilation air from outside of the building, over or through the heat exchanger, thereby heating the air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

The combustion gases typically proceed through the heat exchanger, are collected by a collector box

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS9453648B2Furnace with modulating firing rate adaptation
Publication Date: 2016.09.27 RESIDEO LLC
  • US9453648B2 patent drawing
  • US9453648B2 patent drawing
  • US9453648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A furnace is disclosed that includes a burner with a firing rate that is variable between a minimum and a maximum firing rate. After a call for heat is received, the firing rate is set to an initial level above the minimum firing rate, and the burner is ignited. The firing rate is then modulated downward toward the minimum firing rate. If the flame is lost during or after modulation, the burner is reignited and the firing rate is maintained above the firing rate at which the flame was lost until the current call for heat is satisfied. In some cases, the firing rate is maintained until one or more subsequent calls for heat are satisfied.