Modulation Classifier Using Signal Segmentation and Bias Factors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern communication systems face challenges in maintaining data quality and speed due to interference from various sources, which affects the accuracy of modulation classification in mobile communication systems.

Innovation Solution

A communication system that employs a near maximum-likelihood modulation classifier mechanism, utilizing a mobile station and base station to process signals through a channel analysis module, block calculation module, bias module, and selection module to determine the most likely modulation scheme, thereby reducing interference and improving signal processing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional modulation classification methods are used, then the system can process signals, but the accuracy of modulation classification deteriorates due to interference from various sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulation classification accuracyVSAvoidinterference from various sources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The received signal is divided into multiple blocks, and classification is performed on each block independently. This segmentation allows the system to process interference-affected signals in manageable segments, improving overall classification accuracy by reducing the impact of interference on the entire signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A test signal is introduced as an intermediary to compare with the received signal. The test signal serves as a reference that helps identify the modulation type by comparing characteristics, thereby improving classification accuracy in the presence of interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If complex signal processing methods are employed to improve classification accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulation classification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the received signal itself to generate test signals through autocorrelation operations. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external reference signals or complex training sequences, reducing device complexity while maintaining classification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters such as block size and lag values to optimize the balance between classification accuracy and processing complexity. By adjusting these parameters, the system can adapt to different signal conditions without requiring fundamentally complex processing architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If maximum-likelihood classification is implemented, then measurement precision improves, but use of energy and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulation classification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing exhaustive maximum-likelihood classification on the entire received signal, the system applies classification to partial blocks of the signal. This partial action approach maintains reasonable classification accuracy while significantly reducing energy consumption and processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses temporary, disposable data structures and intermediate calculations that are discarded after each classification decision. This approach avoids maintaining complex state information, reducing energy consumption and processing overhead while achieving classification goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Measurement precision

If detailed block calculation is performed to improve classification accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulation classification accuracyVSAvoidsignal processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The signal is segmented into blocks that can be processed in parallel. This segmentation enables pipelining and parallel processing techniques, improving productivity while maintaining detailed analysis within each block to preserve classification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2754251B1Communication system with modulation classifier and method of operation thereof
Publication Date: 2021.08.18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • EP2754251B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2754251B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2754251B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of operation of a communication system includes: calculating a shift distance of a received signal having a distortion; calculating an approximate likelihood of the received signal matching a transmitted signal from the shift distance; determining a bias factor from the distortion; and selecting a determined modulation maximizing a combination of the approximate likelihood and the bias factor for communicating with a device.