Module Assembly Orientation Detection via Sensing Means

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing module arrangements in security technology lack flexibility and reliability in accommodating different rotational positions and types of submodules, which can lead to incorrect arrangements and potential manipulations, compromising system functionality and security.

Innovation Solution

A module arrangement with a basic module having at least two connection modules that allows submodules to be attached in various rotational positions, equipped with detection means to identify the rotational position and type of submodules, ensuring correct orientation and preventing manipulations through automatic countermeasures, and utilizing a serial interface for data exchange and learning valid configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the base module has at least two connection modules allowing submodules to be attached in different rotational positions, then the adaptability of the modular arrangement is improved, but the complexity of detecting and verifying correct configuration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational position accommodationVSAvoidconfigurational verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual verification of rotational position with automatic detection using sensing means. The sensing means detect the rotational position of submodules and send signals to evaluation electronics, which automatically verify correct configuration. This substitutes the mechanical/manual checking process with an automated sensor-based system, resolving the contradiction by making detection easier while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where sensing means continuously monitor the rotational position of submodules and provide information to evaluation electronics. The system compares detected positions against valid configurations and triggers countermeasures if incorrect. This feedback loop automates the verification process, reducing the difficulty of detecting and measuring configurational correctness while preserving the ability to accommodate multiple rotational positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If sensing means are added to detect rotational position and type of submodules, then the reliability of the safety system is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoiddetection system components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing means serve multiple functions: they detect both the rotational position of submodules and their type identification. The evaluation electronics perform multiple tasks including verifying rotational position, identifying submodule types, and determining whether the configuration is valid. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each detection task, thereby improving reliability without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the sensing means and evaluation electronics into an integrated detection system. The sensing means are positioned to simultaneously detect rotational position and submodule type, and the evaluation electronics process both types of information together to determine overall configuration validity. This merging of detection functions into a unified system improves reliability through comprehensive monitoring while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate detection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If automatic countermeasures are implemented to prevent manipulations, then the security of the safety system is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against manipulationVSAvoidcontrol logic and response mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action by pre-programming valid configurations into the evaluation electronics before the system operates. The sensing means continuously monitor the current configuration and compare it against the pre-stored valid configurations. If an incorrect configuration is detected, the system automatically triggers countermeasures such as activating a safety switch or deactivating the machine. This preliminary setup of valid states and automatic comparison reduces the complexity of real-time decision-making while maintaining high security against manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentEP3128528B1Module assembly
Publication Date: 2020.04.08 EUCHNER GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3128528B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3128528B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3128528B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~4c

AI summary

The invention relates to a module arrangement (1) comprising a base module and at least one submodule (5), wherein the base module has at least two connection modules. The submodule (5) can be selectively connected to one of the connection modules of the base module via a connection module and can thus be attached to the base module in different orientations. The base module provides sensing means for detecting the orientation of the submodule (5) attached to it.