Module Configuration Security via Nonvolatile Baseline Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image forming apparatuses face security vulnerabilities due to illegal changes in module configurations, which can go undetected, potentially leading to information leakage when connected to a network.

Innovation Solution

An image forming apparatus that includes a nonvolatile configuration information storage part to store initial module configurations, a comparison part to detect differences between initial and current configurations, and a notification part to alert the manager of any changes, preventing unauthorized use and ensuring secure operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If module configuration is made changeable to enhance adaptability and functionality, then the system can accommodate new functions and updates, but security vulnerability increases due to potential illegal changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule configuration flexibilityVSAvoidsystem security
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by storing the initial legitimate module configuration in non-volatile memory before any changes can occur. This pre-stored configuration serves as a reference baseline that enables later detection of unauthorized changes, allowing the system to maintain adaptability while preventing security vulnerabilities through proactive configuration management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism by continuously comparing current module configuration against the stored initial configuration at startup. This feedback loop detects any deviations from the legitimate configuration state, enabling the system to identify illegal changes and prevent their execution, thus resolving the contradiction between configurability and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If configuration changes are allowed without detection to maintain system operation, then productivity is maintained, but security vulnerability increases due to undetected illegal changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation continuityVSAvoidundetected configuration changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection by storing the legitimate configuration state before operations begin. This pre-established reference enables continuous monitoring without interrupting system operations, allowing the system to maintain productivity while proactively identifying unauthorized configuration changes that could compromise security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by comparing current configuration against the stored baseline at each startup or configuration change event. This feedback mechanism ensures that any illegal changes are detected and reported to the manager, preventing undetected vulnerabilities while maintaining continuous operational awareness and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If strict configuration control is implemented to enhance security, then security vulnerability is reduced, but system adaptability decreases due to restricted module changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem securityVSAvoidmodule configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism - the stored initial configuration - that mediates between security requirements and adaptability needs. This intermediary reference configuration enables legitimate changes by authorized managers while blocking unauthorized modifications, thus resolving the contradiction by providing a neutral baseline that both security and adaptability can reference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism compares any configuration changes against the stored baseline and provides information to the manager. This allows legitimate adaptive changes to proceed when approved, while automatically preventing unauthorized changes, thus maintaining both security and adaptability through intelligent monitoring rather than strict control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If configuration monitoring is added to detect illegal changes, then security is enhanced, but device complexity increases due to additional monitoring components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration change detectionVSAvoidmonitoring system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service monitoring by automatically comparing its own configuration state against the stored baseline without requiring external monitoring components. This self-diagnostic capability enhances security through continuous verification while minimizing device complexity by using the system's own resources for monitoring rather than adding separate monitoring hardware or software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the initial configuration state and stores it in non-volatile memory for comparison purposes. This copying approach enables detection monitoring by maintaining a reference replica of the legitimate configuration, allowing the system to verify its own state without complex monitoring infrastructure, thus enhancing security with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8427662B2Image forming apparatus capable of managing configuration information of multiple modules
Publication Date: 2013.04.23 RICOH CO LTD
  • US8427662B2 patent drawing
  • US8427662B2 patent drawing
  • US8427662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming apparatus is disclosed that includes multiple application modules configured to perform image processing including scanning, printing, and copying of an image; multiple service modules configured to perform an image forming operation and to control the image forming apparatus; a nonvolatile configuration information storage part configured to contain first configuration information of the application modules and the service modules; a configuration information comparison part configured to read second configuration information of the application modules and the service modules and compare the first configuration information and the second configuration information before starting the application modules and the service modules; and a notification part configured to notify the manager of the image forming apparatus of the difference between the first configuration information and the second configuration information in response to detection of the difference.