Module Initialization with Dependency Graph Phase Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing module frameworks face challenges in ensuring proper initialization of modules and their dependencies, leading to potential conflicts and incomplete initialization due to varying implementation details and complex dependency graphs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for initializing a module by performing a sequence of processing phases on the module and its dependencies, with each phase followed by a graph walking phase to verify completion, ensuring all dependent modules have completed the same phase before progressing to the next phase, thereby ensuring successful initialization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a module framework supports multiple hardware platforms and operating systems with modular software solutions, then adaptability and versatility are improved, but device complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring initialization states worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The initialization process is divided into discrete phases (e.g., resolution phase, binding phase, verification phase) that can be independently tracked and managed. Each phase represents a segment of the overall initialization, allowing the system to handle complexity through structured breakdown while maintaining adaptability across platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by tracking the initialization state of each module and its dependencies. The graph walking process provides feedback about completion status, allowing the framework to adapt its initialization strategy based on actual state information, thereby managing complexity through informed decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the framework performs comprehensive initialization verification across all dependency graphs, then reliability is improved, but loss of time and productivity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The framework performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing the dependency graph structure and pre-identifying initialization phases before actual module loading. This preliminary setup enables more efficient initialization execution, as the system already knows what needs to be verified and in what order, reducing time loss during runtime initialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs graph walking on dependency graphs selectively - only when necessary to verify initialization completion. Rather than continuously verifying all dependencies, the framework performs partial verification actions targeted at specific modules and phases, balancing reliability assurance with time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If the system tracks initialization phases across all modules in a dependency graph, then manufacturing precision and measurement precision are improved, but device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprecisionVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The phase tracking mechanism serves multiple functions: it tracks initialization progress, verifies dependency satisfaction, detects conflicts, and provides state information for debugging. This universal tracking system achieves high precision in monitoring without proportionally increasing complexity, as a single mechanism handles multiple monitoring tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The dependency graph acts as an intermediary structure that organizes modules and their relationships. By mediating between individual modules and the initialization control logic, the graph structure enables precise tracking of initialization states without requiring direct complex interactions between all modules, thereby managing complexity through structured intermediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7934084B2Method and system for module initialization with an arbitrary number of phases
Publication Date: 2011.04.26 ORACLE AMERICAN INC
  • US7934084B2 patent drawing
  • US7934084B2 patent drawing
  • US7934084B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for initializing a module that includes identifying a first module for initialization, and performing a plurality of processing phases on the first module and all modules in a dependency graph of the first module. Performing the plurality of processing phases includes, for each module, executing a processing phase of the plurality of processing phases on the module, determining whether the processing phase has been executed on all modules in a dependency graph of the module, and when the processing phase has been executed for all modules in the dependency graph of the module, executing a subsequent processing phase of the plurality of processing phases on the module.