Module Specification Validation for Industrial Automation Integration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Integration of module type packages (MTPs) in industrial automation systems is error-prone, leading to increased engineering effort and potential system failures during site acceptance testing due to insufficient validation of module specifications, especially when third-party vendors are involved.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method for validating component specifications in industrial automation systems using an invariant specification, which defines invariants that must be satisfied for module integration, including structural and semantic checks, with a validation system that provides error reports and remedial actions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If module specifications are integrated without validation, then integration speed is maintained, but system reliability deteriorates due to potential failures during site acceptance testing
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by performing validation of module specifications before integration into the automation system. The validation process checks component specifications against predefined invariants and constraints, identifying errors in third-party vendor modules before they are integrated. This advance validation prevents failures during site acceptance testing while maintaining efficient integration processes, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and time loss.
2Adaptability or versatility
If third-party vendor modules are integrated without validation, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to semantic errors in module specifications
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary validation mechanism that mediates between third-party vendor modules and the automation system. The validation process acts as an intermediary layer, checking module specifications against predefined invariants and constraints before integration. This intermediary validation ensures that semantic errors are detected and corrected, maintaining specification accuracy while preserving the ability to integrate modules from multiple vendors.
3Measurement precision
If comprehensive validation is performed on all component specifications, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional validation infrastructure
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies segmentation by dividing the validation process into distinct, modular components. The validation system is segmented into separate validation rules, each checking specific invariants or constraints of module specifications. This modular segmentation allows comprehensive validation of component specifications while keeping the validation system itself manageable and maintainable, thus resolving the contradiction between validation accuracy and system complexity.
Data Source
AI summary
A computer-implemented method and system for validating a component specification defining at least one component of an industrial automation system, wherein the component specification is arranged in an object-oriented data format, includes obtaining an invariant specification specifying one or more invariants that must be satisfied for the component specification to be deemed fit for use in conjunction with the industrial automation system; and validating the component specification using the invariants specified in the invariant specification.


