Moisturizer-Free Two-Ply Tissue Paper for Softness and Versatility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Moisturizer-uncoated all-purpose tissue paper struggles to achieve high sensory evaluation values for softness and smoothness while maintaining strength and avoiding skin damage, particularly at a low price.

Innovation Solution

A two-ply tissue paper with specific properties, including a basis weight of 10.0 to 16.0 g/m², paper thickness of 120 to 200 µm, softness of 1.0 or less, and dry tensile strength of 240 to 300 cN/25 mm, manufactured using pulp fibers, polyamide epichlorohydrin as a wet paper strengthening agent, and a combination of polyacrylamide and cationic starch as dry paper strengthening agents, along with fatty acid ester and fatty acid amide compounds as softeners.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If moisturizer is applied to tissue paper to enhance soft feeling and smoothness, then sensory evaluation values improve, but the tissue becomes specialized for nose blowing and facial purposes only, losing versatility for wiping dirt and dust

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensory evaluation valueVSAvoidversatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of moisturizer content from 'present' to 'absent', creating all-purpose tissue without polyol coating. By adjusting other parameters like basis weight (10.0-16.0 g/m² per ply), paper thickness (120-200 µm), and using specific strengthening agents, the tissue achieves high sensory evaluation values while maintaining versatility for multiple uses including nose blowing, facial wiping, and dirt removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If all-purpose tissue paper is made without moisturizer to maintain versatility and low price, then cost and versatility are maintained, but soft feeling and smoothness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveversatilityVSAvoidsoft feeling
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention achieves soft feeling without moisturizer by precisely controlling physical parameters: basis weight of 10.0-16.0 g/m² per ply, paper thickness of 120-200 µm, softness of 1.0 or less, and average dynamic friction coefficient of 1.40-1.65. These parameter adjustments enable all-purpose tissue to provide excellent softness and smoothness while remaining moisturizer-free

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite material strategies by combining specific pulp fiber compositions with chemical strengthening agents (polyamide epichlorohydrin, polyacrylamide, cationic starch) and softening agents (fatty acid ester and fatty acid amide compounds). This composite approach creates tissue with enhanced softness, strength, and smoothness without relying on moisturizer coating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Quantity of substance

If all-purpose tissue paper is made without moisturizer to reduce cost, then price is reduced, but soft feeling and smoothness demanded by consumers are not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepriceVSAvoidsoft feeling
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention eliminates moisturizer substance while compensating for its softening effect through precise control of physical parameters (basis weight, thickness, softness) and chemical composition (strengthening and softening agents). This parameter optimization enables production of high-quality all-purpose tissue at lower cost by removing the moisturizer coating process while maintaining consumer-demanded softness and smoothness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If tissue paper is made thinner to reduce material cost, then price is reduced, but strength to prevent breakage during nose blowing is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the parameter balance between thickness and strength by setting paper thickness at 120-200 µm with basis weight of 10.0-16.0 g/m² per ply. This parameter combination, combined with dry tensile strength of 240-300 cN/25 mm for two-ply tissue, achieves cost-effective material usage while ensuring sufficient strength to prevent breakage during nose blowing and wiping operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tissue paper achieves extremely high sensory evaluation values for softness and smoothness, minimizes skin burden during use, and prevents breakage, all while maintaining strength and affordability.

Implementation Method 1

polyamide epichlorohydrin as a wet paper strengthening agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical bonding: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

a combination of polyacrylamide and cationic starch as dry paper strengthening agents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

fatty acid ester and fatty acid amide compounds as softeners

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentEP3351153B1Tissue paper
Publication Date: 2020.11.18 DAIO PAPER CORP
  • EP3351153B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3351153B1 patent drawing

AI summary

[Problem] To provide an all-purpose type tissue paper that is excellent in softness, smoothness, and strength. [Solution] This problem is solved by a two-ply tissue paper that does not have moisturizer applied thereon, that has a basis weight per ply of 10.0-16.0 g/m2, a paper thickness per two-ply of 120-200 µm, a softness of not more than 1.0, a dry tensile strength (T) in the MD direction of 240-300 cN/25mm, and an average dynamic friction coefficient of 1.40-1.65.