Blow Molding Mold Clamp Assembly with Independent Drive

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mold clamp assemblies for blow molding machines require strong, heavy frames to withstand high clamp forces, leading to increased weight, cost, and operating expenses due to the need for heavy drives and frame reinforcement to prevent deformation and ensure parallel mold closure.

Innovation Solution

An extendable and retractable drive is connected directly to one mold half and uses a pivot arm mechanism with a tension member, transmitting clamp forces directly to the opposing mold half without going through the machine frame, thus eliminating bending moments and reducing the frame's strength and weight requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If clamp force is transmitted through the machine frame from one side of the mold to the other side, then the mold halves can be held closed during blow molding, but the frame must be made heavy and strong to counteract bending moments and prevent deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamp forceVSAvoidframe weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The clamp force transmission path is segmented into two independent sides, each with its own drive mechanism. Instead of transmitting force through the frame from one side to the other, each mold half has an independent drive that applies clamp force locally, eliminating the need for a heavy frame to withstand bending moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A new intermediary structure (independent drive mechanisms on each side) is introduced to transmit clamp force directly to the mold halves without using the machine frame as the transmission medium. This intermediary system eliminates the bending moments that would otherwise require a heavy frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If the frame is made strong enough to withstand high clamp forces without deformation, then parallel mold closure is ensured, but the cost of the machine and operating cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold closure parallelismVSAvoidmachine cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The clamp force transmission is segmented into independent paths on each side of the mold, eliminating the need for a heavy, expensive frame. Each side independently maintains its own clamp force, ensuring mold closure parallelism without requiring an expensive reinforced frame structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the expensive, heavy frame structure with lighter, more economical independent drive mechanisms on each side. This substitution reduces both the initial manufacturing cost and the operating cost while maintaining the required precision of mold closure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Force

If heavy frame members are used to transmit clamp force without bending, then the mold halves can be held closed, but the weight and size of the machine increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamp force transmissionVSAvoidmachine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The clamp force transmission system is divided into two independent sides, each with its own drive mechanism. This segmentation eliminates the need for heavy frame members to transmit force across the machine, as each side independently applies and maintains clamp force locally on its respective mold half.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The function of clamp force transmission is extracted from the machine frame and assigned to independent drive mechanisms on each side of the mold. This extraction removes the requirement for heavy frame members, significantly reducing the overall machine weight while maintaining effective clamp force transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If the frame is reinforced to prevent deformation under clamp force, then mold closure parallelism is maintained, but the size of the drives necessary to operate the machine increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold closure parallelismVSAvoiddrive size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system is segmented into two independent drives, one on each side of the mold. Each drive independently controls the clamp force on its side, eliminating the need for a heavy reinforced frame. This segmentation allows for more compact drive mechanisms since they only need to handle half the total clamp force requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Independent drive mechanisms serve as intermediaries on each side of the mold, directly applying clamp force without requiring force transmission through the frame. This eliminates the need for both frame reinforcement and oversized drives, as each compact drive independently maintains its side's clamp force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the strength, weight, and cost of the machine frame while minimizing operating costs by directly transmitting clamp forces to the mold halves, allowing for efficient operation without frame deformation.

Implementation Method 1

transmitting clamp forces directly to the opposing mold half without going through the machine frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Force

Implementation Method 2

uses a pivot arm mechanism with a tension member, transmitting clamp forces directly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Data Source

PatentUS7611657B2Mold clamp assembly for blow molding machine and method
Publication Date: 2009.11.03 GRAHAM ENG CORP
  • US7611657B2 patent drawing
  • US7611657B2 patent drawing
  • US7611657B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mold clamp assembly for a rotary-type or shuttle-type blow molding machine is mounted on a frame and includes a mold opening and closing drive connected to the two mold halves independently of the frame so that when the mold halves are closed, clamp forces are not transmitted to the mold halves through the frame.