Mold Compaction Machine with Segmented Lifting Frame

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing mold portions using sand casting require significant effort for installation and maintenance, and there is a need for improved compaction of molding materials.

Innovation Solution

A machine with an upper compacting system, a frame, and multiple stroke devices that move in a lifting direction to compact molding material against an upper compacting system, allowing for efficient production and installation of mold portions with reduced effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional sand casting methods are used with manual compaction tools, then the installation and maintenance effort is high, but the compaction quality is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompaction qualityVSAvoidinstallation and maintenance effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into multiple support sections (first support section, second support section, etc.) that can be independently adjusted and positioned. This segmentation allows for easier installation and maintenance of individual sections while collectively providing the structural support needed for improved compaction quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional manual compaction tools with an automated lifting system comprising stroke devices and a frame that moves the compacting tool. This mechanical substitution eliminates manual operation, reducing installation and maintenance effort while consistently delivering high compaction quality through controlled mechanical motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If manual compaction tools are used, then the device complexity is low, but the productivity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmachine structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting system incorporates movable support sections and stroke devices that enable dynamic adjustment of the frame position and compacting force. This dynamic capability allows the machine to adapt to different mold configurations and production requirements, significantly improving productivity despite the increased structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure with multiple support sections and the lifting system are designed to handle various compaction tasks and mold types. This multi-functionality allows a single machine structure to perform multiple operations, increasing productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a rigid frame structure is used for stability, then the stability is high, but the adaptability to different mold configurations is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to mold configurationsVSAvoidframe stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is segmented into multiple support sections that can be independently positioned and adjusted. This segmentation provides adaptability to different mold configurations while maintaining overall frame stability through the coordinated arrangement of multiple stable support points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support sections can change their positional parameters (height, horizontal position) to adapt to different mold configurations. This parameter adjustability enables the frame to accommodate various mold sizes and shapes while maintaining stability during the compaction process through controlled positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The machine enables improved compaction and reduced effort in producing mold portions, enhancing the efficiency and productivity of the sand casting process.

Implementation Method 1

The first stroke device and the second stroke device are configured to lift the frame (150), the pattern (140) and the flask (130) in an upward lifting direction (z-direction) towards the upper compacting system (110)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

compact the molding material in the flask by the upper compacting system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3895828A1Machine and method for producing a portion of a mold
Publication Date: 2021.10.20 KUNKEL WAGNER GERMANY
  • EP3895828A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3895828A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3895828A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A machine (100) for producing a portion of a mold comprises an upper compacting system (110), a frame (150) for an upward directed moving in a lifting direction (z), and at least a first stroke device (160) and at least a second stroke device (170). The frame (150) comprises at least a first support section (154), at least a second support section (155) and a pattern receiving section (151). The pattern receiving section (151) is configured to receive at least a pattern (140), and during the upward directed moving a flask (130). The first stroke device (160) is connected to the first support section (154) and the second stroke device (170) is connected to the second support section (155). The frame (150) is moveable in the lifting direction (z) towards the upper compacting system (110) for producing the portion of a mold by extending the stroke devices (160, 170).