Injection Mold Draft Communication via 3D Decals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the mold making process for injection molding, inexperienced customers often struggle to understand and implement necessary draft angles on mold faces, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs due to ambiguous communication of draft directions and requirements.

Innovation Solution

A software system that analyzes CAD files and provides feedback through 3D renderings with decals and color schemes to clearly indicate the direction and amount of draft needed on mold faces, using symbols and colors to communicate essential design changes, ensuring that customers can accurately modify their designs for manufacturability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If color coding is used to indicate draft requirements, then information can be conveyed, but the meaning is ambiguous and customers cannot understand the direction of draft needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication clarityVSAvoidcustomer understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses color coding on the 3D rendering to indicate different draft requirements. Specific colors are applied to different faces of the part to show which faces need draft and the amount of draft required, making the information visually intuitive and easy to understand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces symbolic indicators (arrows, icons) as intermediaries between the color coding and the customer's understanding. These symbols are overlaid on the 3D rendering to clearly indicate the direction and magnitude of draft needed, bridging the gap between abstract color codes and concrete manufacturing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If text descriptions are provided separately from the rendering, then draft requirements can be specified, but the communication remains complex and difficult to implement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedraft requirement specificationVSAvoidcommunication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the draft requirement information directly onto the 3D rendering by applying colors and symbols to the actual part geometry. This integration eliminates the need for separate text descriptions and allows customers to understand draft requirements in the context of the visual model, significantly reducing communication complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If face-to-face meetings are held between moldmaker and customer, then complex decisions can be made, but the process is time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign decision qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated feedback system where the software analyzes the customer's part design, identifies draft requirements, and communicates them back through the colored rendering with symbolic indicators. This automated feedback loop replaces time-consuming face-to-face meetings while maintaining high-quality design decisions, as the system provides immediate, actionable guidance on draft requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables customers to self-service by providing them with the tools to understand and modify their own designs. The colored rendering with symbolic indicators empowers customers to identify draft requirements and make necessary design changes without requiring extensive moldmaker intervention, reducing both time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7630783B2Communicating mold/part manufacturability issues
Publication Date: 2009.12.08 PROTO LABS INC
  • US7630783B2 patent drawing
  • US7630783B2 patent drawing
  • US7630783B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer program analyzes a CAD file provided by a customer of a custom part to be injection molded. Feedback from the analysis is provided to the customer through a rendering of the part. Rather than merely communicating using color as applied to the rendering file and separate text, the invention applies one or more symbols as “decals” to the rendering of the part provided to the customer. In one preferred embodiment, the symbols are chevrons or arrows which indicate the direction of additional draft needed on particular faces for the part to be sufficiently manufacturable. The symbols are sized appropriately for the size of the face to which they are applied, and are oriented to match the orientation of the face. The symbols may also indicate other information, such as the magnitude of draft needed, magnitude of thickness required, the surface finish to be applied at that location, or time or location based properties of the injection molding process.