Mold Parting Line Identification via Draft-Angle Face Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer-aided design (CAD) systems struggle with efficiently identifying the parting line for complex molded parts, leading to time-consuming manual adjustments and potential errors, especially for faces that straddle both positive and negative draft angles, which can result in visible defects and increased manufacturing complexity.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system that automatically identifies the parting line by characterizing faces as positive, negative, or straddle draft faces, and suggests parting line segments based on draft angles, with options for user intervention to split straddle faces and correct unnecessary loops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual methods are used to identify parting lines for complex molded parts, then flexibility and control over design decisions are maintained, but time consumption and potential for errors increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparting line identification accuracyVSAvoidtime for manual adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic identification of parting lines by analyzing draft angles and geometric features of the part model itself, without requiring manual intervention. The algorithm autonomously characterizes faces, identifies candidate parting lines, and detects unnecessary loops, allowing the system to serve itself in the parting line identification process while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis and visual inspection with an automated computer-based algorithm that processes the part model digitally. The system uses computational geometry and draft angle calculations to identify parting lines, substituting human expertise with an automated computational system that operates faster and with consistent precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automatic parting line identification is implemented, then productivity and speed are improved, but handling of straddle faces and complex geometries may lead to errors and visible defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of parting line identificationVSAvoidaccuracy for straddle faces
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the part model into multiple faces and characterizes each face independently based on its draft angle relative to the parting direction. By dividing the complex geometry into manageable face-level analyses, the system can accurately handle straddle faces and complex geometries that would be difficult to process as a whole, thereby maintaining reliability while achieving automatic identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms to detect and correct errors in automatic parting line identification. It identifies unnecessary loops and validates candidate parting lines against geometric constraints, providing feedback that ensures accuracy for straddle faces and complex geometries while maintaining high productivity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If detailed characterization of each face is performed to ensure accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparting line location accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of characterization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality analysis by characterizing each face individually based on its specific geometric properties and draft angle relative to the parting direction. Rather than applying a uniform complex analysis to the entire part, the system tailors its analysis to each face's local characteristics, achieving high manufacturing precision while managing computational complexity through localized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12353800B2Parting line identification
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 DASSAULT SYSTEMES SOLIDWORKS CORP
  • US12353800B2 patent drawing
  • US12353800B2 patent drawing
  • US12353800B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-based method is disclosed for identifying a parting line for molding a real-world part based on computer model of the part. The method includes receiving a computer-based representation of a modeled part and a parting direction for the mold to make a real-world version of the part. Then a computer-based processor characterizes each respective one of a plurality of faces in the computer-based representation of the modeled part as a positive draft face or a negative draft face. The method includes identifying, as at least a segment of the parting line, a boundary edge between a first one of the positive draft faces and a first one of the negative draft faces that neighbors the first one of the positive draft faces.