Moldable Input Device Using Thermoplastic Layer for Ergonomic Customization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current input devices, such as computer mice, are not customizable to individual user preferences, leading to discomfort and potential physical injuries due to their static design and material limitations, which can exclude users with disabilities or conditions from using them effectively.

Innovation Solution

A moldable input device system featuring a thermoplastic layer that can be heated to a moldable state, allowing users to conform it to their hand shape, attached to a rigid outer shell with integrated electronic circuitry, using biodegradable polymers like polycaprolactone (PCL) or ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), enabling multiple reconfigurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If injection-molded plastic materials are used to form input devices, then manufacturing efficiency and structural stability are improved, but customization capability and user comfort are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The input device is divided into a permanent rigid outer shell and a separate moldable thermoplastic layer. This segmentation allows the shell to maintain structural stability while the layer provides customization capability, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing efficiency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device combines rigid plastic material for the outer shell with thermoplastic material for the moldable layer. This composite material approach enables both structural stability from the rigid shell and customization from the thermoplastic layer, simultaneously achieving manufacturing efficiency and user comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If static one-size-fits-all design is used, then device complexity is reduced, but user comfort and accessibility are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign simplicityVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The thermoplastic layer is pre-applied to the rigid outer shell in a factory setting, creating a standardized base product. Users then perform the customization action at home by heating and molding the layer. This preliminary action maintains simple manufacturing while enabling personalized comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables users to customize their own input devices at home using simple heating and molding steps. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex professional customization processes while maintaining user comfort and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If non-moldable materials are used, then structural stability is improved, but customization capability is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device separates structural functions (handled by rigid non-moldable outer shell) from customization functions (handled by moldable thermoplastic layer). This segmentation allows each material to optimize its properties without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The combination of rigid plastic and thermoplastic materials creates a composite structure where the rigid shell provides structural stability and the thermoplastic layer provides moldability and customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If thermoplastic material is added for moldability, then customization capability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The thermoplastic layer is pre-applied to the rigid outer shell during factory manufacturing. This preliminary action simplifies the overall process by preparing the customization substrate in advance, reducing the complexity of user-side customization operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a customizable and ergonomic input device that reduces discomfort and physical strain, accommodating various user hand shapes and conditions, while being durable and water-resistant.

Implementation Method 1

A moldable input device may comprise a formable layer that is comprised of a thermoplastic material that, when heated to a certain temperature, may be molded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

thermoplastic material that, when heated to a certain temperature, may be molded (or at least the outer surface is moldable) to conform to the physical characteristics of a hand of a user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS11126277B1Moldable input device system
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 MOUSE TAILOR GRP LLC
  • US11126277B1 patent drawing
  • US11126277B1 patent drawing
  • US11126277B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to a moldable input device. A moldable input device may comprise a thermoplastic polymer layer that is heatable to achieve a moldable condition that allows for a reconfiguration of the thermoplastic polymer layer. After heating, the thermoplastic polymer layer may then be placed on a rigid outer shell of an input device and molded by user engagement (e.g., a user's hand). After a certain period of time, the thermoplastic polymer layer will have cooled and hardened, capturing the molding impressions and imprints of the user's hand. The rigid outer shell may then be affixed to a base plate of an input device, and the rigid outer shell and the base plate may form an enclosed cavity, wherein circuitry for an input device is maintained and protected. In some examples, the thermoplastic polymer may be polycaprolactone or ethylene vinyl acetate.