Molded Enclosure with Integrated Handles for Industrial Equipment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional protective equipment for electronic devices in industrial environments is often heavy, costly, and inadequate in preventing damage from impacts and overheating due to poor ventilation when not oriented as intended.

Innovation Solution

A protective assembly for enclosures featuring a molded, cast, or extruded sheet metal frame with integrated handles and screw bosses for accessory attachment, which reduces weight and cost by eliminating extraneous parts, while providing impact protection and improved handling through a top-down assembly method.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional protective cases are used for electronic equipment in industrial environments, then protection against impacts and damage is improved, but weight and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against impacts and damageVSAvoidweight of protective equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the protective enclosure and handling features into a single integrated structure. The molded enclosure incorporates integrated handles directly into the protective housing, eliminating the need for separate protective cases and handling accessories. This merging reduces overall weight while maintaining protection against impacts and damage through the inherent strength of the molded enclosure design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The protective enclosure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides impact protection, facilitates easy handling through integrated handles, and enables accessory attachment via screw bosses. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate protective equipment and handling devices, reducing weight and cost while improving reliability through a unified protective system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If protective cases are added to conventional equipment, then durability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidcost of protective equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The protective features and handling elements are merged into a single molded enclosure structure. The integrated handles and screw bosses are formed as part of the enclosure manufacturing process, eliminating the need for separate protective cases and reducing assembly steps. This integration lowers manufacturing cost while maintaining durability through the robust molded design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs molded construction with optimized structural parameters to achieve durability without requiring additional protective layers. The molding process allows for integrated reinforcement features and ergonomic handle designs that provide protection and ease of handling simultaneously, reducing the need for expensive multi-component protective systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If equipment is placed on surfaces during use, then accessibility is improved, but ventilation is blocked causing overheating

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidoverheating due to blocked ventilation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates elevated feet that lift the enclosure off the supporting surface, creating vertical clearance for ventilation. This dimensional solution allows the equipment to rest on surfaces for accessibility while maintaining airflow paths underneath, preventing overheating without compromising ease of operation or requiring complex active cooling systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the equipment orientation differs from designer intent, then adaptability is improved, but ventilation and protection are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in placement orientationVSAvoidprotection and ventilation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated handles are positioned asymmetrically on the enclosure to provide optimal gripping positions regardless of orientation. The elevated feet are strategically placed to ensure that ventilation openings remain clear of surfaces in various placement scenarios. This asymmetric design maintains protection and ventilation effectiveness while enhancing adaptability to different placement orientations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP3542604B1Protective assemblies for enclosures
Publication Date: 2021.10.13 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP3542604B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3542604B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3542604B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Protective assemblies for enclosures are described. An example apparatus includes a chassis configured to hold one or more electronic systems, a first frame configured to engage a first side of the chassis, a second frame configured to engage a second side of the chassis opposite the first side, and members attached between the first frame and the second frame using fasteners, the members extending between the first frame and the second frame to rigidly secure the first frame and the second frame against the chassis to create an enclosure comprising the first frame, the second frame, and the chassis, the members being exterior to the chassis.